I've been following discussions on the American forums about this all day. I was just wondering what you all thought about it.
A lot of anti-gun people are using this as an excuse to claim we need stricter gun laws. My feeling is that the person who committed the atrocities didn't have any issue with breaking the law that said you shouldn't kill people, so why would he have an issue breaking the law that says you can't have a gun?
What does this all look like from your side of the pond? If you want to know my full opinion, you can read it here: http://www.git-r-slung.com/blog/index.php?itemid=104