One aspect of the 'In the bag not' thread that surprised me was posters questioning the backstop.
Since doing my DSC1 most of my stalking has been alone and thus not subject to peer review. Maybe I'm not being sufficiently cautious?
Assuming the rifle was positioned somewhere near the camera why was the large rising bank of earth above the animal not considered to be sufficient backstop?
Since doing my DSC1 most of my stalking has been alone and thus not subject to peer review. Maybe I'm not being sufficiently cautious?
Assuming the rifle was positioned somewhere near the camera why was the large rising bank of earth above the animal not considered to be sufficient backstop?