What is your opinion? Here in Denmark it gets more and more popular to use the SCI method. Last year I shot a nice sixpointer which scored a 100 CIC but got a silver medal in SCI. It is a very nice looking throphy so it deserved a medal in my book.
And I guess thats the difference. CIC will award medals to the heads that are massive and weights alot. Where SCI will award medals to high or nice looking sixpointers.
I must say that I like SCI best at the moment. I think its more fair to get a medal for a really nice looking symetrical buck(SCI), instead of getting a medal for how heavy it is. (CIC)