CWMMAN3738
Well-Known Member
Following recent threads about the various field sports associations should they unite to become 1 with one voice and more power in the hope of getting somewhere?
Following recent threads about the various field sports associations should they unite to become 1 with one voice and more power in the hope of getting somewhere?
Following recent threads about the various field sports associations should they unite to become 1 with one voice and more power in the hope of getting somewhere?
The response is that a number of them are part of FACE, where all the different agendae come together...allegedly
Not wishing to go off line, but the reason it was thought that the old BFSS was pro hunting only was because, the hunting community has been the only group to get off its axxe and attempt to defend its sport, I remember BASC slagging off the NGO for its national pigeon day (who as a badge for that day), the pistol ban ? Where we're all the shooters. No one organisation would not work, which is what the police and the anti,s like about us.
Not wishing to go off line, but the reason it was thought that the old BFSS was pro hunting only was because, the hunting community has been the only group to get off its axxe and attempt to defend its sport, I remember BASC slagging off the NGO for its national pigeon day (who as a badge for that day), the pistol ban ? Where we're all the shooters. No one organisation would not work, which is what the police and the anti,s like about us.
Even the NRA (UK version) were complicit in the handgun issues in the hope that the 'rest' would be left alone.
No, they just need to co-operate with each other where there is a common interest. atb TimFollowing recent threads about the various field sports associations should they unite to become 1 with one voice and more power in the hope of getting somewhere?