Now before anybody starts I'm asking??
Is it possible that those at the top of our shooting organisations are not our best option for representation? Either because of age, set in ways/opinions, lack fight/motivation, want it to go along smoothly, their views differ from the majority, too much the old boy network, anything you can think of, their experience in invaluable we know, this is not to start a slagging match just to asserting what people think of our leaders in general, we have a general view of politicians but are ours any better?
Good conduct please!