Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 65 deer per square mile : too many ?

  1. #1
    Regular Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Where there are more Muntjac than you can shake a stick at

    65 deer per square mile : too many ?

    Here's some current news from Long Island, New York where local people are trying to pursuade their council to return deer levels to more reasonable numbers :

    The current level of 65 plus per square mile is clearly miles too high, no kidding.

    Locals are suggesting a more reasonable level of 8-10 or fewer per square mile.
    The uncontrolled and rapidly increasing number of deer has brought on a health, safety and environmental crisis in North Fork with widespread cases of deer tick-borne illnesses, auto/deer accidents, forest understory and native species destruction, landscape and crop damage.

    Through the looking glass ...

  2. #2
    where in norfolk are you spix?
    Official Sponsor to Team GB F Class

  3. #3
    North fork, New York is a very cramped place close to the exclusive Hamptons, the locals there probably don't like the deer messing up their golf courses and knocking over their cocktails on the deck as much as anything.
    The only place your linked story might have a possible analogue to in the UK would be Sandbanks in Poole - if it was suddenly invaded by about 15-20 tick-laden Sika or Fallow.
    I thought I could see light at the end of the tunnel, but it was only some fecker with a torch bringing me more work

  4. #4
    not far from me then
    Official Sponsor to Team GB F Class

  5. #5
    Research from both the UK and abroad suggests that deer densities of 4/km2 - 8/km2 are beneficial with woodland regeneration being impacted on at 14/km2 and above. Experimentally Fallow deer were stocked at an artificially high density of 100/ km2 for 22 years and this had a severe impact on the understorey.

    But having no deer at all can also be destructive with more invasive woodland plants becoming dominant and the destructive progression of wood edge and wood pasture habitats to scrub and eventually a species poor high wood habitat.

    IMO what is needed is a balanced approach with deer maintained at sustainable beneficial levels, so 65 deer per square mile does seem rather high.

    atb Tim

  6. #6
    Regular Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Where there are more Muntjac than you can shake a stick at
    Quote Originally Posted by 1967spud View Post
    not far from me then
    Out enjoying the day, Spud, and drove through Aylsham on the way, but no, nowhere near you.

    I like north Norfolk alot but it's a total dead loss socially.

Similar Threads

  1. Going the extra mile
    By finnbear270 in forum Deer Stalking General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23-11-2013, 19:36
  2. Bi-Pod For A Square Stock
    By Jim xyz in forum Rifles & Calibres
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-02-2013, 14:24
  3. 6.5-06 A Square
    By PKL in forum Ammunition, Reloading & Ballistics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 16-09-2011, 00:20
  4. walkie talkies 5 mile
    By MrYou in forum Equipment & Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 15-09-2010, 22:01
  5. 350 mile bike ride
    By apollo in forum Events and Meetings
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26-02-2009, 20:20

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts