Whilst its easy to assume one organisations shooting insurance product is much like another that's not the case. I looked into it a few years ago as a number of my stalking pals/syndicate members were contemplating switching from BASC to one of the other providers, from memory NGO were the favourite at the time. The main difference was that the NGO were secondary insurers, in other words their cover only applied when you had exhausted all other avenues of possible cover that you might have through your household insurance or other public liability insurance, so that in circumstances where you were unfortunate enough to have to make a claim it was far from straightforward and you had to demonstrate none of your other insurances provided you with cover for the insured event. BASC cover was by comparison primary insurance so you did not need to establish you were not covered elsewhere.On some of our deer stalking leases I am the stalking tenant, I am permitted to form a syndicate provided I take responsibility for the actions of the syndicate members. I'm prepared to do so provided the relevant syndicate members indemnify me against that liability. To back up that indemnity I want to see a proper insurance policy in place which I know will provide real cover. For these reasons I won't accept anything other than BASC cover.Aside from this the terms of what the relevant policies insure you against differ as well, so its worth checking out the small print.