woodmaster
Well-Known Member
Just looking at my local news online and came across this article. I have no issue with the deer being shot on grounds that it is injured, but have similar concerns to that raised in the report. I presume the "officer" was using a captive bolt, as using any other type of firearm on that surface could be interesting. However leaving the carcass in open view of the public path it pretty poor practice.
My point is why do we get so much flack from such institutes when they accept that there can be a need to shoot something?
My point is why do we get so much flack from such institutes when they accept that there can be a need to shoot something?