Range finding binoculars Vortex Fury 10-42, Bushnell Fusion 10-42 and Delta T 9-45

Terrydeer

Well-Known Member
So I have a limited budget and the above keep coming up in conversation, I am looking for good low light optics with a range finding option.

So does anybody have hands on experience with these binoculars especially at first and last light.

Thank you for any assistance that you can give.
 
I was keen on the Fury, especially with the new AB ballistic engine. The optics are good in daylight, but for hunting they are let down by their quality in first and last light. The early Fusions were not much chop, though I cant comment on the new ones.

In the end, I went with the Deltas. They range fine, but dont have the ballistic engine of the Fury. But the main difference is the optical quality. I only got to use them last weekend due to being under lock down orders which has only just ended. I found their optical quality quite good at first and last light. I think of the 3 options the Delta is the best.
 
Another plus for the Deltas, excellent quality glass IMO (Ive got two of their scopes so was familiar with the quality and performance of the brand).
the range finding is accurate and works well, and dawn/dusk performance is very good indeed. A mate has the swaro equivalent and putting the, next to one another, your very hard pushed to tell any difference tbh - so much so that said mate wishes he’d saved himself well over a grand and got the deltas instead!
 
Another for delta 🙋‍♂️ unbelievable quality glass, and ten year warranty on all parts! Wouldn’t swap Myn!!
How do you find your deltas in the rain. The eye piece just steams up and they become unusable. To the point I have to wipe them with my top to try and make them work. I absolutely don't want to touch lensed on my kit while I'm out. I think this is asking for trouble. My vortex vipers don't suffer the same in the same conditions.
 
So I have a limited budget and the above keep coming up in conversation, I am looking for good low light optics with a range finding option.

So does anybody have hands on experience with these binoculars especially at first and last light.

Thank you for any assistance that you can give.
What are you looking to shoot and how far?
 
How do you find your deltas in the rain. The eye piece just steams up and they become unusable. To the point I have to wipe them with my top to try and make them work. I absolutely don't want to touch lensed on my kit while I'm out. I think this is asking for trouble. My vortex vipers don't suffer the same in the same conditions.
Myn have always worked really well tbh. obviously I get abit of steam every now and then but found this with my old swarovski? I use a Alaska guide Bino harness and it does help. I do however clean them after every trip and can highly recommend the zeiss lense cleaning spray from bush wear (think it was around a tenner for two bottles). Streak free and takes 2 minutes to do with a microfibre cloth. They do a fog spray but haven’t tryd this yet
 
I have the Fury's and am delighted with them.
Don't forget Vortex have the best warranty in the business. ANY fault for the lifetime of the binoculars (I.e. fully transferable and no receipt required) is covered.
I know of one guy who lost his Vortex binoculars on the hill and miraculously stumbled on them 2 years later only to find one glass fogged, Vortex replaced with a new set.
 
Myn have always worked really well tbh. obviously I get abit of steam every now and then but found this with my old swarovski? I use a Alaska guide Bino harness and it does help. I do however clean them after every trip and can highly recommend the zeiss lense cleaning spray from bush wear (think it was around a tenner for two bottles). Streak free and takes 2 minutes to do with a microfibre cloth. They do a fog spray but haven’t tryd this yet
I use the Zeiss lens wipes as they are easy when I'm away. Can even keep a couple in my bag. The top lens cap is useless in the field. I was going to look for a set of caps like my vortex ones or a bino harness.
They are a really clear bino. The top lens cap falling off and then them getting wet is the only bad thing about them.
Which Alaska guide harness do you use?
 
What are you looking to shoot and how far?
Hello, I can be looking from 50m - 400m in low light conditions, so the quality of the glass is important as is the range finding, obviously not shooting out to 400m but need to be able to verify heads etc
 
Hello, I can be looking from 50m - 400m in low light conditions, so the quality of the glass is important as is the range finding, obviously not shooting out to 400m but need to be able to verify heads etc
The glass is really clear. They will do that easy. The focus is really fast, but you get used to it.
400m is nothing for them. I was picking goats out at 1450yds which it ranged as well. Which I then had to get too. I wasnt disappointed with it. It was a decent head on him.
Range finder is really good. You can pick brightness as the light fades.
If I am stalking muntjac I take my vortex vipers as looking into cover I prefer them for that. Easier focus (not so quick) and more field of view (8x42 and 150yds max). It's the field of view I miss, the clarity is very high.
I tried the vortex Ab ones. But there was far to much going on in the glass for me. I focussed on the details on the bino not what I was looking at. I know my rifle drops, so I normally zap a couple of spots to give me a rough idea. Then work from that.
Hope that helps
 
I have the Bushnell Fusion ARC in 10x40. The first version. They made some cosmetic changes to the outer casing in the second version, if there were any changes to the insides they didn't emphasise those. The current offerings are called Fusion X, have straight tubes instead of the slightly offset ones on mine, so are slimmer, and seem to have a different illumination method for the readout. In the US the retail price is $699.

Mine, rather old now, do not have the best glass for low light. There is a noticeable blueish tint to the colour, which I presume is due to the beam splitters for the laser, and the display, which I think must reduce the light transmission too. You do have to manually turn the illumination up and down, which is no trouble. I think the new version might do that automatically. Otherwise the glass is OK. Probably about what you'd expect from some £250 binos. The laser is on the left, display on right, which is a slight nuisance since I am left eyed, but they have a separate focus adjuster for the display, as well as the usual parallax thingy, so its easy enough to get everything crisp at the same time.

Nevertheless they are very good rangefinders, the ARC and built in ballistic curves are useful, the battery life is excellent (they take a big CR123 cell). And they comprehensively bested the Swarovski ones of that era, in all but optical performance. At less than a third of the price, when I bought mine. More responsive, faster and more reliable to come up with a plausible reading, tighter spot, precisely aligned, etc. There was nothing else on the market then, that I could afford.

They have rain repellent coatings, which really work.

They reliably ping out to one mile off buildings, actually I think that is an artificial cutoff, at 1760 yards. I have pinged buildings at 1755 yards, then taken a few steps backwards and they refused to register. I can also reliably ping e.g. flying birds at 500 yards, against the sky. They have been heavily used on target ranges, mucking about, and some stalking, where the ranging has been solid to all useful ranges, with brown animals, even through foliage mostly masking them (brush mode). White things like sheep etc. range easily to 750 yards. They also have scan mode, which is surprisingly useful, where they give a continuous readout as you scan around, which I think must put a heavy drain on the battery, and be hard work for the laser. Useful when e.g. sitting in a high seat and getting a feel for and memorising the distances, before a deer walks by.

This is even in strong sunlight, which is a test for any rangefinder, where the laser power has to overcome the strong IR coming back from the target, in sunlight.

Interestingly, if you have a night vision device which sees IR, you can observe where the laser actually lands, how well aligned it might be with the display of the device, how well focussed, it is etc.

Speaking of which, the laser shows no signs of weakening, unlike reports of some Leica and Swaro devices that can seemingly degrade with use, and the new ones carry a "Lifetime Ironclad transferable warranty, no receipt required" whatever that means. My old ones just had a 2 year warranty.

The new Fusion X also make some claim to having perfect colour rendition. I don't know if anyone in the UK has them yet, nor what the price over here might be. But if they are anywhere close to the US $700 RRP (plus VAT, import duty etc.), they might be a contender.

I am obviously biased, because they are what I have, what I could afford at the time. However the low light performance, colour cast and middling optical performance might be a let down. But I daresay there are better things around nowadays. Possibly the Fusion X ?

A secondhand set at a good price might still be worth considering, as a rangefinder I still think they are very good. Optically very usable in good light, and not too bad in low light.

Finally I think that making LRF binos in e.g. 10x42 is sub-optimal for most situations. E.g. 8x42, with better low light performance, and wider field of view, would surely be a benefit to many of us. Bushnell used to make the Fusion ARC in 8x32 but that was not ideal either, and the basic structure was the same, only with shorter and slimmer objective lenses, and some weight saving.
 
Back
Top