Think of salmon smolts as fledgling birds - they’re most at risk when they leave the relative security of the nest and join the wider, harsher world - so it is with the smolts, that typically run like mercury out of the rivers, but never return. Presence of predatory animals and birds indicate a healthy food source. Over a century ago Malloch of Perth was tagging and releasing salmon smolts in order to track their movements. He determined that a sizeable proportion of east coast river smolts spent their first few months travelling around the north coastline and down into the Western Scottish sea lochs, feeding on the rich pickings available there. A simple means of verifying this would be to remove all the salmon farming from the waters there (they produce more toxic pollution in our inshore waters than the sewage tonnage of all the West Scottish coastal conurbations combined, but without the associated treatment costs, with predictable outcomes for marine health in the vicinity), as I understand they have now done in Chile, which formerly had a substantial salmon farming industry; alas corruption among our governing classes plays a large part in the continued plunder and pollution of our marine environment. Naturescot are nowhere to be seen, too busy trying to extirpate the stag and the grouse from the hills, having seen to the demise of the salmon.While im sure fish farming does not help, if it was a massive cause would there not be a big difference between the east coast and west coast rivers in salmon numbers? I know the est coast has always had some big salmon fishing rivers but numbers in them has crashed also.
No doubt fish eating birds with cormarants now very widespread inland in big numbers, possibly also rise in otter numbers, no doubt the rise in seal numbers is have a big effect esp coupled with low flow some late summer autumns, making iteasy to eat large numbers trapped in low pools.
1 thing i was told by the local fishery manager who was prety clued up on salmon conservation and did make a big difference to catches on the local river.
He reckoned the global warming ( yes i know everyones favourite bogeyman) but he said where salmon traditionally feed the water temp has risen just enough to let other more competative/voracious?sp feeders in and their hammering the feed that salmon used to have almost all too themselves.
I know the rivers will never have been cleaner in the last 50-100 years, at the time ( mibee 10-15 years ago) he reckoned the smolt numbers leaving was really pretty healthyish and the problem was out too sea with not enough coming back
I read somewhere that each salmon cage releases the same amount of sh1te as a herd of 1000 cows. Added to that they use ammonia to help control the sea lice.
In fairness, global warming will impact salmon, low river levels mean the fish cannot reach the spawning grounds. Low levels also mean that predators have a greater effect because fish are more concentrated.
All irrelevant anyway, because at the current rate beavers will stop them getting upstream!
Used to enjoy the tussles with Grayling there.Cormorants on river Vvrnywy destroyed fish stocks and now otters.
In early 80s lots of chub and dace now all gone.River levels are lower and then huge floods.
D
Indications from recent research are that a lot of smoults are dying before they reach the feeding grounds, seemingly from poor nourishment along the way.Protecting fish eating birds doesn't help either!
David.
Except I can sit at the mouth of a couple of our local rivers and watch literally hundreds of cormarants taking smoults at the "right" time of year. This must dent the smoult population quite significantly.Indications from recent research are that a lot of smoults are dying before they reach the feeding grounds, seemingly from poor nourishment along the way.
If enough parr are surviving to smoult phase then the depredations of the birds don’t matter, far more will be taken by predatory fish.
All other things being equal, and God knows they’re not, the birds can only hunt in daylight and within a relatively few feet of the surface.Except I can sit at the mouth of a couple of our local rivers and watch literally hundreds of cormarants taking smoults at the "right" time of year. This must dent the smoult population quite significantly.
David.
Comorants can dive pretty deep after their prey. Certainly a lot more than a few feet of the surface.All other things being equal, and God knows they’re not, the birds can only hunt in daylight and within a relatively few feet of the surface.
They also need a bit of visibility to hunt.
We don’t see the bass and pollack lined up, but they’re there.
I think it’s been proven through smolt tracking that up to 96% of smolts get predated before they reach the sea…… on the Welsh coast there’s no fish farms, the seatrout don’t migrate that far, there’s plenty of food ( bass are doing very well) no large towns and sheep farming point the cause in one area- predation of parr and smolts…..I have seen more goosander on the river Dyfi in the last five years than seatrout…the rivers rod catch has gon from 2,000+ in 2015 to about 300 a year now. there’s a petition on change .org that’s been in T&S and FF&FT but only has 3k signatures…. Anglers can be massively appathetic…. Disappointing…. If you think basc can sometimes screw up take a look at the angling trust- never an unkind word for the EA/ NRW it seems….While im sure fish farming does not help, if it was a massive cause would there not be a big difference between the east coast and west coast rivers in salmon numbers? I know the est coast has always had some big salmon fishing rivers but numbers in them has crashed also.
No doubt fish eating birds with cormarants now very widespread inland in big numbers, possibly also rise in otter numbers, no doubt the rise in seal numbers is have a big effect esp coupled with low flow some late summer autumns, making iteasy to eat large numbers trapped in low pools.
1 thing i was told by the local fishery manager who was prety clued up on salmon conservation and did make a big difference to catches on the local river.
He reckoned the global warming ( yes i know everyones favourite bogeyman) but he said where salmon traditionally feed the water temp has risen just enough to let other more competative/voracious?sp feeders in and their hammering the feed that salmon used to have almost all too themselves.
I know the rivers will never have been cleaner in the last 50-100 years, at the time ( mibee 10-15 years ago) he reckoned the smolt numbers leaving was really pretty healthyish and the problem was out too sea with not enough coming back
Actually, I see a fair few salmon jumping the Tewkesbury weir, fresh from the tide, but I have no idea the survival rate. There are a few Tewkesbury residents who religiously fish for them every day and we see some caught and returned, but I’d rather we left them alone. The EA were fishing the weir for Shad - now very rare, so catching them with spinners hardly seemed a sensible thing to do. I still see sea trout or Peal in Cornish spate rivers but in secret places not far from the sea - not much runs up the Camel and Fowey anymore, which is a great pity. Until we sort our environmental policies and practices out and stop giving into woke here-today-gone-tomorrow Ministers playing to a gallery of re-wilding anti’s with an axe to grind, the decline will continue. Wow! My first rant on SD. I’ll calm down, now….At my first job in Shrewsbury Jim the store man was an avid salmon fisherman and in the 60s caught 50 to 60 salmon a year on Shrewsbury weir.
Today that could be the total annual run on the Severn. Past being endangered close to extinct.
D