Alpex Pro first impressions

ColinBr

Well-Known Member
I managed to get out this morning with a break in the rain to try out the Alpex Pro.

First shot was showing low and to the right. This was adjusted and I then put the remaining 9 into the bull, so safe to say it adjusts properly. Something I sometimes found a bit hit and miss with the 4K model.

PXL_20260606_105428070.webp

Overall the daytime picture is on a different level compared to the 4k and very impressive for a digital scope. That added to the much improved ergonomics makes for a very useable package.
The picture quality as you zoom in is again on a different level to the 4k.

I keep referring to the 4k as that was the previous digital scope I had.

It is not without fault though, but these are small niggles that will be ironed easily with an update.

Main issue I found was the reticles being too fine and being lost in the noise of the target. Possibly not an issue on a deer or the likes but certainly not as clear as the 4k. This was even after adjusting the reticle thickness, style and colour options available. This was particularly noticeable when shooting at distance using the hold off marker with the ballistic calculator. The hold off marker is tiny.

Next being the fact that it actually uses the small external battery first. The scope actually shutdown after about an hour of use as this battery died. This is when I noticed it was then using the main inboard battery next. Something that was not the case with the 4k and to top it off, when it powered back up it had changed the reticle style. Luckily the zero had stayed. Still something that needs addressing.

As said these are small niggles that will no doubt be rectified with an update in the coming weeks as Hik are quick to get onto these things.

I also experienced the fact that none of the shots were recorded as per comments on another thread. I was only using a 22lr with subsonics so not exactly anything you could call recoil to activate it.
 
Nice one mate, I've had the pro for a few weeks now and it's still in the box not had a chance to mount it yet.
Between work and hospital visiting my old man there's never enough hours in the day just now.
Hows tricks with you?
 
Nice one mate, I've had the pro for a few weeks now and it's still in the box not had a chance to mount it yet.
Between work and hospital visiting my old man there's never enough hours in the day just now.
Hows tricks with you?
Much the same mate. Busy as always and then had the man flu over the last couple of days.

So just got out while I could and gave it a quick try out.
 
All of the newer HIKMICRO scopes to my knowledge use the external battery first, my lite certainly does and I’m fairly sure my mates Stella 3 does. My 4k uses internal first. How bigs the internal battery? Assumed it was an 18650. Have they cut it down to a smaller cell to save weight?
 
I managed to get out this morning with a break in the rain to try out the Alpex Pro.

First shot was showing low and to the right. This was adjusted and I then put the remaining 9 into the bull, so safe to say it adjusts properly. Something I sometimes found a bit hit and miss with the 4K model.

View attachment 478220

Overall the daytime picture is on a different level compared to the 4k and very impressive for a digital scope. That added to the much improved ergonomics makes for a very useable package.
The picture quality as you zoom in is again on a different level to the 4k.

I keep referring to the 4k as that was the previous digital scope I had.

It is not without fault though, but these are small niggles that will be ironed easily with an update.

Main issue I found was the reticles being too fine and being lost in the noise of the target. Possibly not an issue on a deer or the likes but certainly not as clear as the 4k. This was even after adjusting the reticle thickness, style and colour options available. This was particularly noticeable when shooting at distance using the hold off marker with the ballistic calculator. The hold off marker is tiny.

Next being the fact that it actually uses the small external battery first. The scope actually shutdown after about an hour of use as this battery died. This is when I noticed it was then using the main inboard battery next. Something that was not the case with the 4k and to top it off, when it powered back up it had changed the reticle style. Luckily the zero had stayed. Still something that needs addressing.

As said these are small niggles that will no doubt be rectified with an update in the coming weeks as Hik are quick to get onto these things.

I also experienced the fact that none of the shots were recorded as per comments on another thread. I was only using a 22lr with subsonics so not exactly anything you could call recoil to activate it.
How does it compare to the 4K at night…?
 
All of the newer HIKMICRO scopes to my knowledge use the external battery first, my lite certainly does and I’m fairly sure my mates Stella 3 does. My 4k uses internal first. How bigs the internal battery? Assumed it was an 18650. Have they cut it down to a smaller cell to save weight?
All the Alpexs before this used the internal first. I know this as I've had them and he's it is the 18650 external battery
 
Last edited:
One initial niggle I have found using on my Weihrauch HW100 - zeroing is easy, save settings etc, but then when I come to use on an outing the strike point has shifted 1/2" either left or right at 25yrds, so need to check the zero before going out on rats, squirrels etc..
 
A lot of the feedback and comments t on the forums suggest there are a fair few issues with the Pro......

Hik do have a habit of doing beta testing post launch ..... and issuing software changes to sort out the many glitches their initial software coding seems to have.....

In terms of the night time image, the Pro doesn't really compete with the Alpex 4 - but the crux of the Pro is its designed to complement the 4k not replace it - and is focused (intended) on producing the best possible daytime image achievable by a digital scope.

If you want it for predominantly daytime use it is better than the 4k.

Counter intuitive for me though.......digital scopes were conceived for night and low light use. If you want a good image daytime, not sure why you would want to replace good glass....but I am 57 and a dinosaur......,🙂
 
One initial niggle I have found using on my Weihrauch HW100 - zeroing is easy, save settings etc, but then when I come to use on an outing the strike point has shifted 1/2" either left or right at 25yrds, so need to check the zero before going out on rats, squirrels etc..
The first thing I want to say to that is - what?
This is exactly what people have said about digital v glass - me included as I have both.
Personally I couldn’t put up with that level of unreliability. 1/2” at 25 yards is a hell of a long way at 100
 
A lot of the feedback and comments t on the forums suggest there are a fair few issues with the Pro......

Hik do have a habit of doing beta testing post launch ..... and issuing software changes to sort out the many glitches their initial software coding seems to have.....

In terms of the night time image, the Pro doesn't really compete with the Alpex 4 - but the crux of the Pro is its designed to complement the 4k not replace it - and is focused (intended) on producing the best possible daytime image achievable by a digital scope.

If you want it for predominantly daytime use it is better than the 4k.

Counter intuitive for me though.......digital scopes were conceived for night and low light use. If you want a good image daytime, not sure why you would want to replace good glass....but I am 57 and a dinosaur......,🙂
I certainly wouldn't change from my Z6 for the Pro.

The 4k like you say was never going to be beaten for low light and night time shooting.

I have no doubt the Pro will be fine for night shooting with a decent IR. I have the Blade and I'm sure it will produce a decent enough sight picture for me to take a shot on a deer if needed on licence.
 
The first thing I want to say to that is - what?
This is exactly what people have said about digital v glass - me included as I have both.
Personally I couldn’t put up with that level of unreliability. 1/2” at 25 yards is a hell of a long way at 100
I'll check mine next time I'm out to see if it has shifted POI. I'll update the thread if that is the case.

Its the first I've heard of this particular issue but certainly worth noting.
 
A lot of the feedback and comments t on the forums suggest there are a fair few issues with the Pro......

Hik do have a habit of doing beta testing post launch ..... and issuing software changes to sort out the many glitches their initial software coding seems to have.....

In terms of the night time image, the Pro doesn't really compete with the Alpex 4 - but the crux of the Pro is its designed to complement the 4k not replace it - and is focused (intended) on producing the best possible daytime image achievable by a digital scope.

If you want it for predominantly daytime use it is better than the 4k.

Counter intuitive for me though.......digital scopes were conceived for night and low light use. If you want a good image daytime, not sure why you would want to replace good glass....but I am 57 and a dinosaur......,🙂
Strangely enough…we were discussing this subject (optical vs digital) at the range this morning…conclusion “I’ll stick to glass”.
 
Strangely enough…we were discussing this subject (optical vs digital) at the range this morning…conclusion “I’ll stick to glass”.
Unless you need digital for night shooting there is no point. Good glass wins

Unless the deer you have are heading back in before first light or after sunset
 
Got out on the range and zero’d between showers on Friday. Like a dick I read all the blurb, watched all the video’s and still managed to freeze on the bullet strike and not the centre of target 🙄

My ‘opinion’ though for what it’s worth is that it is going to help no end with the before first light and after last light which is when the deer on my permission start moving about.

Previous to this I’ve been able to watch stuff thermally but not been able to see a bloody thing optically 😳 playing about with the pro across the fields since I bought it and it feels like a bit of a revelation.

I get the glass vs argument but ‘for me’ it seems to fit the bill as far as I’m concerned.

Si
 
Glass is unbeatable in daytime


When multi spectral gets up to speed I’ll use that
I’ve got a couple on my pigeon air rifles lads and there a god send at night in sheds , my mate ( half my age - better eyesight 😁) is pinging pigeons at 60m .. just the hat with the ballistic calculator , I’ve lost zero once for no apparent reason but you can re- zero within a minute . Glass all day and thermal for foxes but Alpex for pigeons 😁👍
 
Hmmm.
I am a big fan of digital scopes having pretty much replaced glass on my .22lr, .17hmr and .222 but I have on occasion had loss of zero issues though thankfully very few and to my recollection no injured quarry as a result - largely because I do a lot of regular card-punching so any such rare problems are invariably sorted before live animal shooting.
There have been many reports of “loss of zero” across the many digital scope iterations indeed it is said above that one major digital manufacturer has a habit of releasing scopes before issues such as loss of zero are ironed out - if true this for me is both unacceptable and unforgivable - would you accept such poor production from a glass scope? Of course not - nor would you buy another. More importantly and again, if correct, said manufacturer is facilitating poor marksmanship and thus almost certain unnecessary wounding of quarry species - be it from a rat through to red deer. Unforgivable in the extreme and something we as a shooting community need to resolve - it should be no surprise that manufacturers are heavily influenced by sudden drops in sales….
🦊🦊
 
Hmmm.
I am a big fan of digital scopes having pretty much replaced glass on my .22lr, .17hmr and .222 but I have on occasion had loss of zero issues though thankfully very few and to my recollection no injured quarry as a result - largely because I do a lot of regular card-punching so any such rare problems are invariably sorted before live animal shooting.
There have been many reports of “loss of zero” across the many digital scope iterations indeed it is said above that one major digital manufacturer has a habit of releasing scopes before issues such as loss of zero are ironed out - if true this for me is both unacceptable and unforgivable - would you accept such poor production from a glass scope? Of course not - nor would you buy another. More importantly and again, if correct, said manufacturer is facilitating poor marksmanship and thus almost certain unnecessary wounding of quarry species - be it from a rat through to red deer. Unforgivable in the extreme and something we as a shooting community need to resolve - it should be no surprise that manufacturers are heavily influenced by sudden drops in sales….
🦊🦊
I think a lot of electronics manufacturers are guilty of this, from iPhones with big updates coming out later to meet launch dates, to the latest HIK or ATN 😱 scope that isn’t ‘right’, but IWA and SHOT is coming up and release dates are pivotal to consumer awareness and take up.

Blame the manufacturers? They have no clue about hunting, they’re engineers, trust me!
I think as hunters we need to be aware of the risks in adopting the technology and realise it’s fraught with wounding or missing risks in early launch stages, and maybe test extensively on paper for a while before bringing into live game
 
Back
Top