I know of one aw that has been slated on here for refusing to accept a stalk because he did not like the actions of the stalker. Said the standard was below the acceptable limit. As he charges was accused of doing so to make more money. How do you draw the line between acceptable levels and unacceptable? The thread ran to several pages and if the estate was mensioned it would kick off again. Does it mean an AW cannot fault a stalker for fear of accusations true or false. Estate/fallow/Dumfries might help someone remember. Jim[/QUOTE
Just so theres no Mistake it is no Red, the AW marks down what he See's nothing more or less, if he doesn't like something he can, if he so wishes write it down in the witness narrative like wise, the candidate can also write down, what took place IT ! is up to the IV to say HE DOESN'T LIKE WHAT TOOK PLACE AND TO DO IT AGAIN ! carrying out the laid down procedure for that particular element , the AW only writes it how he See's it, and writes what answers he is given .
Anyone that is doing anything different they need to go for another briefing and look at the CD provided with the witness notes .
It is just like it says in the title WITNESS, since when was the Witness in the Jury and the Judge that right, NEVER thats the IVs job to reject portfolios , as they do quite frequently this has been written on this site every other month since the site started ,come on read the notes provided ,its enough to rip yer knitting .