Impossible to tell .. stationary in a layby or stationary in traffic?Looks like she's stationary.
Impossible to tell .. stationary in a layby or stationary in traffic?
One is legal, one isn`t.
All for one and one for all........Or should it read....
One rule for all!
A young PC caught right out
View attachment 77222
Tim.243
send it in to the beeb.
i bet it would not even get a mention,
bob
Looks like she's stationary.
If she is not stationary (And it is hard to tell from the photo) then this is a great advert for those who are supposed to uphold the law!
We are the people who comprise the police - not all of us are 100%. Statistics show that a fair percentage of the police force have or have had a criminal past. When Satellite GPS devices were installed in police cars initially, a number of male and female teams were found to be stationary for long periods in out-of-the way places.
Using a phone is dangerous - if she isnt stationary but you might expect it given they are us.
Impossible to tell .. stationary in a layby or stationary in traffic?
One is legal, one isn`t.
Double yellows!! chances are she is illegally parked.
Exactly EMcC. A somewhat childish post that maybe speaks volumes of the immaturity of the OP. Some people on here should grow up. Instead of seeing a picture on the internet and without any apparent further specific knowledge of the facts, run off at the mouth.
The OP has no idea of the circumstance of the PC having to use the mobile, she may have had no radio "net" and it may be that force of circumstance obliged her to act as she did and use another form of communication that was working and available to her.
In which limited necessity that the law still allows it. Which is in to contact the emergency services via 999 or 112 in an emergency and it is unsafe or impractical to stop.
So lacking a radio "net" she could well have been requesting by the only means then available to her an ambulance or the fire service to go to the situation she might have been responding to.
As you say, EMcC, demonised whenever given the chance but the first to be called when in trouble or need help.
Exactly EMcC. A somewhat childish post that maybe speaks volumes of the immaturity of the OP. Some people on here should grow up. Instead of seeing a picture on the internet and without any apparent further specific knowledge of the facts, run off at the mouth.
The OP has no idea of the circumstance of the PC having to use the mobile, she may have had no radio "net" and it may be that force of circumstance obliged her to act as she did and use another form of communication that was working and available to her.
In which limited necessity that the law still allows it. Which is in to contact the emergency services via 999 or 112 in an emergency and it is unsafe or impractical to stop.
So lacking a radio "net" she could well have been requesting by the only means then available to her an ambulance or the fire service to go to the situation she might have been responding to.
As you say, EMcC, demonised whenever given the chance but the first to be called when in trouble or need help.
All as you say ES, perhaps she was in a Tizzy and that is why she is pushing her hair back with the other hand.
she was sat in traffic when the photos were taken - so hardly an emergency and why would she be responding to a emergency if the radio were not working - how would she have known about it??? i think that you are somewhat clutching at straws here....Exactly EMcC. A somewhat childish post that maybe speaks volumes of the immaturity of the OP. Some people on here should grow up. Instead of seeing a picture on the internet and without any apparent further specific knowledge of the facts, run off at the mouth.
The OP has no idea of the circumstance of the PC having to use the mobile, she may have had no radio "net" and it may be that force of circumstance obliged her to act as she did and use another form of communication that was working and available to her.
In which limited necessity that the law still allows it. Which is in to contact the emergency services via 999 or 112 in an emergency and it is unsafe or impractical to stop.
So lacking a radio "net" she could well have been requesting by the only means then available to her an ambulance or the fire service to go to the situation she might have been responding to.
As you say, EMcC, demonised whenever given the chance but the first to be called when in trouble or need help.
Hardly an emergency and why would she be responding to a emergency if the radio were not working - how would she have known about it?
Pick the bones out of this one.....
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/119761...while-driving/
Tim.243
stop being difficult obviously he was directing an ambulance to an emergency.....