Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 73

Thread: Night hunter shot man he mistook for fox

  1. #1

    Night hunter shot man he mistook for fox

    I came across this just on a random search about foxing. This is some scary S H I T, scary how 3 experienced hunters could take a shot at something without knowing for sure that it was a fox they were shooting at. Just reiterates the importance of being 100% sure about 1. Sure about the target 2. Who else is using the land

    Stay safe.


    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2004/aug/27/2



    Heres the text:

    A hunter who shot a leading wildlife expert after mistaking his night-vision binoculars for a fox's eyes was cleared of assault yesterday.
    Anthony Burns, 52, from Prestwood, Buckinghamshire, was out "lamping" for foxes late one night in April last year when he shot and seriously injured journalist Trevor Lawson, 37.
    Aylesbury crown court heard Mr Lawson had been looking for barn owls along a footpath through farmland near the village of Hyde Heath, Buckinghamshire, when he was shot in the chest with a hunting bullet designed to disintegrate inside the body of an animal to kill it more effectively.
    Although there was no suggestion Mr Burns shot Mr Lawson deliberately, prosecutor Neil Moore argued unsuccessfully that he had acted recklessly.
    But the jury believed Mr Burns when he said he had been "100% sure" he had been shooting a fox. The jury took just under two hours to unanimously clear him of causing grievous bodily harm.
    Mr Burns hugged family members, who were weeping for joy, after the verdict. His solicitor, Stephen Betts, said: "He's just very grateful, it was a tragic accident."
    Mr Lawson was not in court and his wife left without commenting.
    But speaking by telephone later, Mr Lawson said: "The verdict makes no difference to me in the sense that the damage is already done and it is massive damage. If I put my finger in the hole in my ribcage where my ribs used to be, I can feel the blood pumping through my aorta."
    The jury was also told during the trial that Mr Lawson was pursuing a civil action for damages against Mr Burns.
    The court heard Mr Lawson spent two days in intensive care, lost a lung and still has part of the bullet under his skin.
    Mr Burns had two decades of shooting experience, including "lamping" - a form of night hunting using a red filtered light which is difficult for the fox to see - without incident.
    Under an arrangement with the farmer on whose land the accident happened, Mr Burns and a group of friends rear pheasants in pens and organise small-scale shoots.
    With the farmer's permission, he and his two fellow lampers would go on periodic expeditions to shoot foxes so as to protect their pheasants.
    On the night of the accident the three had already shot one fox and were ready to turn in for the night when they decided to make one last visit to a field where one had earlier got away.
    The lamp picked up a fox and the court heard that Mr Burns had seen the whole animal three times before picking up a "massive set of eyes".
    Convinced that what he saw was the same fox he had seen moments earlier, Mr Burns pulled the trigger but to his horror heard Mr Lawson screaming in agony. He went to Mr Lawson's aid and found him lying on the ground while one of his companions called an ambulance.

  2. #2
    Lamping is the most dangerous form of shooting and some times when the pressure is on mistakes have can and will happen i dont know one person who dose not have a scary story about lamping.
    Last edited by 6pointer; 12-09-2010 at 11:12.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by 6pointer View Post
    Lamping is the most dangerous form of shooting and some times when the pressure is on mistakes have can and will happen i dont know one person who dose not have a scary story abut lamping.

    Agree. I guess its also easy to get complacent, this put things back into perspective. Its probably actually worse having 3 people out together!! Too much peer pressure, if 2 of them were saying yes defo a fox it would have reassured him. Frightening.

  4. #4
    Mistakes should not happen.Take a pair of binos with you an look through them before taking a shot that way you will know what your shooting at.if in doubt don't shoot.all the pheasants ever bred won't replace one man dead.a fathers advice.if you can't identify don't shoot.simples

    https://m.facebook.com/UKSHA-502164506587351/
    Discretion assured
    - call us anytime, free on 0800 689 0857

    please visit our web site: uksha1
    or find us on facebook
    Sponsored proudly by Pfanner, Blaser, Clark Forest, John Forsey sports

  5. #5
    Lamping is no more dangerous than any other form of shooting if you follow the golden rules. Know your land and the other people who use the land inside out, inform others who use the land that you are there, if you are out with a companion only one person shooting, inform the local Police of your activities and above all, never shoot at anything you cannot clearly identify in your scope as a fox and that the shot can be taken safely.

  6. #6
    +1

    https://m.facebook.com/UKSHA-502164506587351/
    Discretion assured
    - call us anytime, free on 0800 689 0857

    please visit our web site: uksha1
    or find us on facebook
    Sponsored proudly by Pfanner, Blaser, Clark Forest, John Forsey sports

  7. #7
    Old news, I remmber at the time that it was implied that the wildlife watcher who got shot may have been watching the shooter rather than the wildlife!!

    Dave

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by devilishdave View Post
    Old news, I remmber at the time that it was implied that the wildlife watcher who got shot may have been watching the shooter rather than the wildlife!!

    Dave
    Must have looked like the eyes of a buffalo never mind a fox!!!!

  9. #9
    Account Suspended
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Bonnie Scotland
    Posts
    3,447
    Quote Originally Posted by devilishdave View Post
    Old news, I remmber at the time that it was implied that the wildlife watcher who got shot may have been watching the shooter rather than the wildlife!!

    Dave
    Evidently, the "victim" was to sue for damages in a civil action after the defendant was cleared of the charge GBH. Has anyone found out what happened in the subsequent case?

  10. #10
    Along with others who are more clued up than some,I would like to make it clear, night shooting of any form, (other than on the field of battle), is no more dangerous than any other form, if you mix idiots & feeble minded individuals together with firearms / fireworks /alcohol / motors............. then the results will be plain for all.
    Last edited by finnbear270; 12-09-2010 at 08:32.
    (The Unspeakable In Pursuit Of The Uneatable.) " If I can help, I will help!." Former S.A.C.S. member!

Similar Threads

  1. Scotsman, shootin man, doggy man, good pint man!
    By parlanaich in forum Introductions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27-08-2010, 15:00
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 14-04-2010, 12:32
  3. atn nvg-7 gen2+ night vision gogles +atn night spirit gen2+b
    By wraith in forum Deer Stalking Equipment
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-01-2010, 19:45
  4. Man and Dog
    By morena in forum Jokes & Funnies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-12-2009, 21:39
  5. old man
    By McStalk in forum Jokes & Funnies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25-01-2009, 20:06

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •