Has anybody seen the May edition of Sporting Rifle?
I have just has a week away with the wife and dog in a Hotel in town and to fill my time, bought the May edition, it is getting better, quite good in fact.
There is mention on page ten, the letters page by a subscriber, of a web site that has not been very complimentary of the SR magazine.
To my mind the letter is written in such a way as to curry favour from the editor in the hope of winning the bottle of Whiskey for best letter, but it didn't.
The reply by the editor is quite good too, he has a way with words which are not very complimentary to the subscribers to the web site referred to by the letter writer.
From the letter and the reply, I think Mr James Johnstone may be referring to the SD web site.
I could be wrong, as I am of similar age to him and at this stage in life often get things wrong.
Next time any of you are in town, pop into Smiths, the Library and have look on page ten and see what you think.
I have just has a week away with the wife and dog in a Hotel in town and to fill my time, bought the May edition, it is getting better, quite good in fact.
There is mention on page ten, the letters page by a subscriber, of a web site that has not been very complimentary of the SR magazine.
To my mind the letter is written in such a way as to curry favour from the editor in the hope of winning the bottle of Whiskey for best letter, but it didn't.
The reply by the editor is quite good too, he has a way with words which are not very complimentary to the subscribers to the web site referred to by the letter writer.
From the letter and the reply, I think Mr James Johnstone may be referring to the SD web site.
I could be wrong, as I am of similar age to him and at this stage in life often get things wrong.
Next time any of you are in town, pop into Smiths, the Library and have look on page ten and see what you think.