I'm very uncomfortable with this and would like to know why. It wouldn't be PC to show grouse shooting, or fox hunting, in a positive light and yet the very same do-gooders who object to nearly everything are, all of a sudden, keen on stalking. When stalking is presented on TV it s rare that we even get an appearance by some nut job from "fiends of the earth" or similar stating their objections so there is no question in my mind that showing stalking in a positive light has been a decision taken at the highest level - compare to the man made global warming lie, for example, where the media would not broadcast the opinions of anyone who objected because the decision that the lie was "true" and without any valid objection came from the highest level. Consider the "green taxes" and other interference that this has lead to.
As you say you can hardly turn on the TV without finding some interfering do-gooder telling you how stalking is a necessary evil and how all kills are clean and so on and that scares the life right out of me.
You might think I'm merely cynical and maybe you'd be right but when I see a range of media outlets, which appear unconnected, showing what would normally be a contraversal activity in a completely positive light and with no appearances by those you would normally expect to object then I form the opinion that something is up. I would be almost certain that it isn't an accident that, all of a sudden, a range of media outlets have shown stalking in a positive light and I would also be certain that the same source is driving this and that it is done with an agenda.
What the agenda is I have no idea but as I've said before I think it was Ronald Regan who said that the most frightening words a citizen can hear are "I'm from the government and I'm here to help you."