There you go! Peter Fraser reckons that it is all you lowland stalkers fault. Roedeer totally out of control. Red deer an endangered species, all 350000 of them. Craven shoots a crap group and Fraser says fine?
Thats a crap group? I can only manage one like that from sandbags at 50 yards!
Close? I bayonet more than I shoot!
Still no answer to the underlying question, namely why is it necessary to destroy one type of habitat to replace it with another (trees)? What is the problem that supposedly can only be fixed by destroying an open hill habitat and relaxing it with forest? Who has decided that, and why?