Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: DSC2 Candidate Narrative

  1. #1

    DSC2 Candidate Narrative

    I have just completed my first DSC2 stalk with an approved witness. As part of the process I am required to write a 'candidate narrative'. As I can't find any examples online and have little or no guidance what is required I decided to post my draft narrative to this forum. I have removed information that can ID the farm or AW. I would much appreciate your feedback!


    DSC2 STALK NO: 1
    SUNSET: 8.14PM.
    LOCATION: ....


    This farm and land was unfamiliar to me as it was the AW who holds the deer stalking rights. Deer believed to be present on this farm is just roe, however in the wider area (within approx. 10Miles) all species except for CWD are found, but mainly Roe, Muntjac and Fallow.

    This dairy farm has been registered organic for over 10 years. Many of the pastures retain the ridge and furrow pattern which developed in the middle ages. The various fields and pastures are gently sloping providing excellent views and backstops in many places, and are offset by very thick hedges, brooks and deep ditches, providing great habitat for wildlife. However main roads, bungalows and farm buildings are visible from almost anywhere on the farm, and a public footpath runs across the land, so safety is of the utmost importance.
    On arriving on the farm at approx. 6.30PM the AW asked me to get my equipment ready and we walked some 500 yards to a vantage point where we discussed the lay of the land, assessed the wind direction and agreed on the general route we would follow over the land. At this point I under-loaded my rifle (Stage 3- see D.I. Best Practice guides)) and with an empty chamber and closed bolt but full magazine (5 rounds) the stalk commenced. Also, at this point I released I had left a small shoulder bag with my gralloching equipment in the car, I suggested I should go back to the car before proceeding, however it was agreed that as we would be within approx. 1/2 mile from the car at any point of the stalk we would deal with that if and when we would cull an animal, which we both didn't really expect as the land had been quite unproductively lately and the weather conditions averse. We proceeded along the agreed route, roughly upwind as much as possible and in a long semi-circle following hedges, ditches and crossing through to the next fields taking care to carefully scan the fields and hedgerows, and those in the next fields where possible. We spotted many brown hares and two foxes but found no sign of deer, not even tracks in the fresh mud, so at approx. 7.30pm I decided to find a suitable location for using the Buttalo call in the hope that we would still be able to interest a roe buck, despite it being towards the end of the rutting season- which never really started in this area. I found a shaded and sheltered area in a hedge with good views over several fields and hedge rows and proceeded to call using both the fawn and buck call alternatively for some 15min, but no deer showed.

    We proceeded with the stalk in now fading light when we entered a new field and spotted a solitary roe buck browsing some 150 Yards away and upwind from us, gently moving directly towards us. I cycled a round into the chamber and applied the safety catch (Stage 4). We were at this point some 10 Yards from the shelter of the nearest hedgerow and quite exposed and in the open, and proceeded to 'freeze' whenever the buck seemed alert and looked at us, and moved to set up the shooting sticks and shoulder my rifle when the buck had his head down. I checked with the AW that this buck was a suitable cull animal and got confirmation I could take him if a shot presented itself. Using a x6 fixed power scope I would have preferred to take the shot from under 100 Yards but I felt that due to our very open and exposed position our movements could be spotted and I decided to use the Buttalo call to try to get the buck's interest in the hope he would get closer to us and present a better shot. However the buck did not respond to the call and was slowly browsing and now slightly angling away from us towards thick shelter, so when he stopped for a moment and presented himself broadside I took the shot aiming for the vital area (heart/lung), after checking again I had a safe back-stop. I felt the shot was good and was confident I had hit correctly, however the buck jumped up high and seemed to haunch its back and fled into thick cover. At this point its behaviour was as if it was gut shot. Immediately after the shot I reloaded another round, applied the safety catch, and we marked the point of the hit as well as the point where the animal went into cover (some 20 Yards from the P.O.I.). We slowly and gently proceeded to the P.O.I. and started looking for blood and pins, and at this point, in the fading light, I was not quite sure exactly where the buck had entered the cover. It took some 30min of searching the very thick hedge and ditch, using a torch light, before I found the animal, dead (confirmed with the blink test) in deep cover inside the hedge, some 30 Yards from the point where I believed it had entered the cover. I unloaded my rifle and made it safe. The shot placement had been good (vital area) within 2" left from the aiming point, the exit wound was slightly forward through the shoulder. I checked the carcass for signs of disease, ticks etc, and found it in excellent clean physical condition but with a 'head' which was not great, and spiky antlers which could easily lead to wounding another buck, therefore an excellent cull buck. I judged there was no need to 'bleed' the carcass as it was clear the shot was either hart or lungs and the chest cavity would contain all the blood. It was by now almost completely dark so I asked the AW to help me to carry the animal to the car, a walk of only some 10min. Once at the car I felt I shouldn't perform the gralloch in front of the farmers house on the car parking area -which was heavily contaminated with cow pats- and as we were only a 10min. car drive from the AW's house, and it was a cool night, we agreed to take the carcass in my carcass tray and perform the gralloch there under more hygienic and controlled conditions and with good light.

    I removed the legs, accidentally cutting one of the sinews on one of the bag legs. The gralloch was duly performed (1. Oesophagus tied off; 2. Anus freed and tied off; 3. Rumen and intestines and other organs removed); on a carcass rack and under good light conditions; taking great care to remove the entire alimentary track without contaminating the carcass. Kidneys and liver were all normal. On removing the pluck the heart showed shot damage to the top but the lungs were intact. The lungs were normal. I inspected the various lymph nodes (Mesenteric, Gastric, Bronchial, Mediastinal, Portal) but decided to remove the head and inspect the Sub-maxillary and Retropharyngeal nodes at my own home after removing the antlers. I declared to the AW that I had found no abnormalities, that in my opinion the carcass was fit for human consumption, but as I had no intention on selling it on to catering or an AGHE there was no need to complete a Hunters Declaration. On arriving at my own home the carcass was hung in a cool drafty place, packed with freezer packs in disposable wrapping in the cavity and wrapped in a fly-proof cover, to be delivered to a local larder at 7AM the next morning, for approx. 1 week of hanging before skinning and butchering.

  2. #2
    From my experience "least said soonest mended" !!!

  3. #3
    Hi Eric,
    That is far too much detail, nothing wrong with that but is more than is needed.
    The narrative should be just a short story of what you did on the day and, in one or two cases, why.
    For instance, we decided to approach from this direction because the terrain gave us cover or because of wind direction etc.
    I have found that most/all of my candidates manage to get it on one sheet of a4 and have had no come backs yet.

  4. #4
    I have just completed my level 2 and have had my portfolio passed by my assessor, all i am waiting on now is my certificate coming in. Hopefull soon.

    I wrote about half of what you have written in your first paragraph for my full candidate narrative and the assessor said that was plenty. Its just a general right up of your stalk.

    Cheers Rob
    Last edited by Bigboab29; 08-09-2012 at 23:43.

  5. #5
    I don't want to sound mean or harsh but, the narrative is part of your level 2 portfolio and forms part of your assessment. The idea is that YOU write a short account of your version of the stalk,that the assessor can compare with the AW's version of events, it is not really a matter for universal "proof reading" on the internet, and probably why you could find no other examples. As has been said, just a short version of what happened as you see it, no need for excessive detail, and definitely no need for soliciting help, hints, tips,pointers call it what you will via the web.

    A clever man knows his strengths, a wise man knows his weaknesses

  6. #6
    You will get a phone call interview by your assessor and maybe someone further up the line. It can be nerve wracking. Keep it short, relivent to the task on hand, the stalk. You give too much information you expose yourself to unnecessary questions. You have opened up muntjac questions on a roe stalk, redraft asking what questions could that comment lead too. Jim

  7. #7
    Eric, I'll send you a copy of one of mine. Not saying its any better or worse than your's but hopefully it'll show just how little info is required.

    Below is a link to my website.
    Quad sticks

  8. #8
    Hi Erik keep it short.
    do not take the head home it must be inspected in front of aw sub & retropharyngeal.
    head hung on a hook & skin lower jaw to inspect the sub/retro.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by JAYB View Post
    I don't want to sound mean or harsh but, the narrative is part of your level 2 portfolio and forms part of your assessment. The idea is that YOU write a short account of your version of the stalk,that the assessor can compare with the AW's version of events, it is not really a matter for universal "proof reading" on the internet, and probably why you could find no other examples. As has been said, just a short version of what happened as you see it, no need for excessive detail, and definitely no need for soliciting help, hints, tips,pointers call it what you will via the web.

    +1 It is as simple as if you were writing a Days events in your diary no one helps you to write your DIARY.


  10. #10
    I feel there should be an example paper available for candidates. I just read the introduction and have enjoyed it. I will read the rest tomorrow. How boring it would be to get a 30-40 line version of the days events. If I was an examiner, I would want to enjoy the read with some interesting information. I liked the info and description of the land etc and effects of past farming techniques. I hope you handed in the lengthy version. I think it would have been a welcome change for the examiner. Hope you put deer present are and not is Roe..... Looking forward to reading the rest tomorrow.

Similar Threads

  1. DSC2. Why?
    By WiltsPat in forum Training and Qualifications
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 08-09-2012, 08:08
  2. Dsc2
    By straightbetweentheeyes in forum Training and Qualifications
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 20-10-2011, 10:41
  3. Candidate number??
    By DazT in forum Training and Qualifications
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 30-07-2011, 19:48
  4. DSC2
    By Danger Mouse in forum Deer Stalking General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 30-01-2010, 18:14
  5. DSC2
    By shootingduckdog in forum Deer Stalking General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28-01-2009, 22:45

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts