Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Q2

  1. #1

    Q2

    Q2. What is your view on whether collaborative deer
    management structures should continue to be voluntary in the
    first instance?

    I believe this is absolutely the way that it should be. There are so many different interests involved that I believe it will be unworkable to legislate.

  2. #2

    Re: Q2

    This is a bit of an 'Are you still beating you wife?' question.

    Q: D'you think they should be voluntary in the first instance?
    A: Yes
    R: Good! So do we. We'll swap to compulsory in a year or two.


    Q: D'you think they should be voluntary in the first instance?
    A: No
    R: Fair enough: compulsory at once!

    To me, the word 'collaboration' implies either treacherous co-operation with an occupying enemy or, in peace-time, a working together with voluntary agreement.
    They obviously want us to think of the latter definition, but can such a thing happen under compulsion?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •