Velkom to da stat Komrad.
Please remember rule no 1 . One must not hurt the criminal or interfere with them in any way.
Crime is important being a Multi Billion industry and we would like to keep it that way and keeping the populace frightened is a easy way to control them.
Agreed, BUT, it wasn't OFFENSIVE use, it was DEFENSIVE use against some pikey scum trying to use another lethal force to run down the shooters mother. The law (in theory) allows for 'reasonable force' to protect yourself or others or to prevent crime, an ounce of lead surely is reasonable when up against 2tons plus of transit van being directed towards a human being with the intent to seriously maim or kill.Crosshair243 Truer words never been stated..there is no condition on an SGC/FAC THAT PERMITS SELF DEFENCE OR OFFENSIVE USE OF A GUN IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, if you want a revocation that is the quickest method to achieve it !
WTF is wrong with the uk just look at the rest of the world we have got it so wrong due to do gooders and human rights!!
if he had used a hammer or an axe he still would have his guns an tickets removed ....its sh-tCrosshair243 Truer words never been stated..there is no condition on an SGC/FAC THAT PERMITS SELF DEFENCE OR OFFENSIVE USE OF A GUN IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, if you want a revocation that is the quickest method to achieve it !
I know I keep repeating myself and rising to this, but the rest of the world is populated by humans, and as such they have human rights, same as us. And the fact that we actually enforce human rights legislation is something to be proud of, not bemoaned. I think a presumption in favour of not shooting people for whatever reason is an excellent thing.
if he had used a hammer or an axe he still would have his guns an tickets removed ....its sh-t