Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Felt Recoil 308 v 243

  1. #1

    Felt Recoil 308 v 243

    I am Looking to purchase a light weight (sub 7lb ) rifle for stalking and occasional range use, I had pretty much decided on 243 as my calibre of choice but am now contemplating whether 308 might be the way to go, I am surmising an extended range session with a light weight rifle in .308 might be a little hard on the shoulder! I would welcome any advice/opinions as to the difference in felt recoil from the two calibers. I currently reload for a 44 magnum lever action so would be able to tailor my loads accordingly .This would be my first stalking rifle - as you may have guessed!

    Many thanks.

  2. #2
    I've owned a rather large number of 243's so far in my life and NONE ever had any noticable recoil in my opinion !

    I've owned several 308's as well and while they all shot well three of them had rather robust recoil with 150 grain handloads . Two of them were stainless synthetic Remington Model 7's and the third was a tang safety Ruger 77RSI . All three of these rifles were light . By no means am I new to recoil as I regularly shoot most all of the belted magnums up to the 416 REM MAG . But those three light 308's would thump you pretty good at the bench , although they were great for carrying and as usual recoil went unnoticed when shooting deer !

    At the present I own one circa 1963 Mannlicher Schoenauer in 308 thats very nice from the bench but it weighs maybe 2 more pounds !

  3. #3
    I use a .308 for stalking, using a decent moderator, I hardly notice the recoil. Your problem on the range is more likely to be the barrel heating up on a lightweight spotter set up. I fire three shots on the range and then give it 10 minutes to cool down.

  4. #4
    308 harsh in my opinion

  5. #5
    energy = recoil, the remainder of the equation is down to rifle weight and fit.
    A 100gr .243 doing 2600fps will kick the same as a 100gr .308 doing 2600fps - all other things being equal.

    If it is truly a stalking rifle this shouldn't be an issue as you'll only fire one or two rounds, usually with a jacket on.
    Skinny gun putting 20 rounds down on a bench, without a mod and in a tshirt, you'll know about it.

    P.S. HTFU

  6. #6
    There are some figures and info here to help you decide...

    http://www.chuckhawks.com/recoil_table.htm

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Milligan View Post
    energy = recoil, the remainder of the equation is down to rifle weight and fit.
    A 100gr .243 doing 2600fps will kick the same as a 100gr .308 doing 2600fps - all other things being equal.
    not as straight forward as that

    you will have significantly different charge volume of powders burning at different rates
    comparative bearing surface of bullets

    a full case of VVN165 going off is a steady shove
    a full case of VVN110 going off could feel a lot "snappier"

    fit is a big part and one that is often overlooked
    I have one .270 that is too short and leads me to hold it in an unnatural position.
    have to give a rodeo hold on the sling or it jumps out your hand!!
    by contrast a rifle in the same caliber and lighter that I rebuilt with an extra 1" LOP just bounces nicely

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by paultap View Post
    I am Looking to purchase a light weight (sub 7lb ) rifle for stalking and occasional range use, I had pretty much decided on 243 as my calibre of choice but am now contemplating whether 308 might be the way to go, I am surmising an extended range session with a light weight rifle in .308 might be a little hard on the shoulder! I would welcome any advice/opinions as to the difference in felt recoil from the two calibers. I currently reload for a 44 magnum lever action so would be able to tailor my loads accordingly .This would be my first stalking rifle - as you may have guessed!

    Many thanks.
    Even a 243 in a light rifle has a noticeable recoil. I have shot a lightweight Ruger in 243 with a short stock and was very surprised by how much it jumped around, whereas my 8lb ish Heym 243 is nice and mild. 308's do give a healthy shove - not an issue with an experienced shot, but enough to cause a flinch in a novice shooter. A 243 is a really good rifle to learn with, and more than adequate for most deer stalking, unless you are mainly shooting Sika and Red. If you feel you want a bit more than 243 then have a look at the 6.5x55, or 7mm-08.

    Gunfit is also important - a well fitting rifle handles recoil well. A poorly fitted rifle, badly held will whack you.

  9. #9
    Just zeroed a 223 a 243 and a 308 yesterday.
    The 243 weighed 3.8kg total, the 308 4.4kg total both incl. moderators. 100gr in the 243 and 155/168 in the 308.
    Off the bench in a t shirt there was a big difference.
    A 308 can be nasty or really pleasant to shoot in my opinion mainly because of stock shape and weight distribution.
    The worst example I had was an old sako forester, if you didn't hold the forend tight it would flip up at least 45deg when firing off a sand bag. The scope would swivel very close to the eye and would give me a fright. Same rifle in a different stock cured that.
    The nicest recoiling 308 I have fired is my Mauser custom that weighs 6.6lbs without scope. Due to the ultra light carbon stock the rifle has it's centre of gravity on the line of the bore once a medium sized scope is fitted. Very accurate out to 400m, can be shot without holding the forend and has very little muzzle flip because of a fairly high positioned recoil pad.
    I guarantee one can judge the recoil behaviour by looking at the side view lines of a rifle and also by checking the weight distribution by picking up a side on rifle by the centre of the muzzle and the centre of the bolt. Side on view show's the American style straight comb would be better than say the Bavarian hog back comb.

    edi

  10. #10
    I used to have a Tikka T3 in .308 (unmoderated) and found it quite unpleasant to shoot using 150gn factory ammunition, I think this was due to it being fairly light and the stock not fitting me that well. Same rifle in .243 is a pussy cat. Sold the .308 some years ago and bought a Sako L691 in .270 with a moderator which I find much nicer to shoot.

Similar Threads

  1. Felt Recoil Chart
    By Johno100 in forum Rifles & Calibres
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-06-2013, 17:44
  2. I Felt Guilty Afterwards
    By THE STALKER in forum Other Shooting & Keepering
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 27-05-2013, 21:46
  3. .270 noise and recoil compared to a .243
    By pigglet in forum Rifles & Calibres
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-02-2011, 19:02
  4. ITS NOT REALLY A FUNNY BUT A HEART FELT MESSAGE
    By squirrelnutkin in forum Jokes & Funnies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-11-2009, 15:21
  5. 243 in a 308?
    By bobt in forum Deer Stalking General
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 01-09-2008, 21:33

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •