This one really ****es me off, what a total waste.....
The issue i have ( actually i dont have any issues!!!) are the editorials are form the same bunch (actually just a few) month in month out, same old **** dragged up time and time again. Bad bad bad proofing and **** writing style.
As for PC, the mag is just his personal conduit, and sporting rifle is no better, if its not a 700 based tactical then is only ok. I saw an artical on driven Boar where the editor had borrowed a Krieghoff double in 9.3x74R and then kitted it out with a Surefire M4 and an eagle cheek piece. What an arse.
Another artical was detailing a Tubb2000 in 6XC, afer a so so write up the best group went over an inch, what a joke, i know personally is capable of 2s and 3s all day at 100y with any competant shooter behind it...
They should both get fresh blood, proofers who can proof and subject matter experts.
Ive even stopped just reading them in WHS it winds me up so much.
Im going to count to 10 now......