Not worth the effort!
Stick to 50-55 for that twist
Thinking about trying some 75gr Amax in my factory 22-250 tikka (1:14"), and just wondering if they will stabilise theoretically? Has one had any success with these in a standard tikka or anything with the same barrel twist.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Cheers
Joe
I ran a Tikka 22.250 shooting nothing but the 75 grn Amax for several seasons.
You need a 9 twist minimum to stabilze those pills.
Once you get the right twist rate - the 22.250 out performs a standard 243 - I had both calibres at the same time and know from experience
ATB
Alan
forgive me for stating the obvious but how can you compare a 75gr bullet against an 87ge bullet,surely to get a true test both rifle must shoot the same weight of bullet or your finding mean nothingMy 22.250 fired a bullet with a BC of 0.435 at 3360 fps.
The three 243 rifles I have owned could launch an 87 grn Vmax at 3250 - 3300 fps with a BC of 0.400
So it shoots a better BC bullet , faster
The 22.250 can also launch a 53 grn Vmax ( BC 0.289) at 3800 fps
You have to look at the 70 + grns range of 6mm bullets to find a similar BC - and the 243 is sgnificantly down on that velocity.
Alan
its all numbers on paper mate,if its that good why did you sell it ?? and what do you shoot now 6mm isn't itThe reason I compared the 75 grn Amax in 224 cal with the 87 grn Vmax in 243 cal, is because bullets are of similar BC's - and that is the fairest way . In order to achieve the same BC bullet as a 75 grn Amax - you need to look at 90 + grn bullets in 243.
Your last post illustrates this point perfectly - - Yes the 58 grn Vmax in 243 can easily reach 3800 fps - but it only has a BC of 0.250 ( Brian Litz independently measured the BC at 0.238 )
Whereas the 53 grn Vmax in 224 cal has a genuine BC of 0289 - this means it flies flatter - and retains more energy at longer range.
I know I wont convince you - and I don't feel the need to try - But it is worth noting that only one of us can speak from direct experience of owning both the 22.250 shooting 75 grn bullets and directly comparing it to a 243'.
Mine is a unbiased opinion based on experience of firing thousands of rounds using both cals and if that not good enough, just plug the numbers into any ballistic program.
I am not knocking the 243 But the OP asked specifically about the 22.250 shooting a 75 grn bullet - your solution of getting a 243 in preference, wont give him any ballistic advantage - in fact it will be slightly worse ballistically.
Live long and prosper
Alan
its all numbers on paper mate,if its that good why did you sell it ?? and what do you shoot now 6mm isn't it
75g A Max great in 8 twist barrel.
Id use 75g 224 over 75g 6mm any day.
6mm only becomes interesting using 105 0r 107 bullets.....
I see you re barrelled it,may I ask why if it was so good surely its must be batter than a 6br seeing the 243 uses the same bulletI didn't sell it.
I have noticed that you like to quote numbers to prove your point - but when the figures don't go your way - well - its all just numbers on paper.
Yes - I have a 6BR - what's your point.
75g A Max great in 8 twist barrel.
Id use 75g 224 over 75g 6mm any day.
6mm only becomes interesting using 105 0r 107 bullets.....
I see you re barrelled it,may I ask why if it was so good surely its must be batter than a 6br seeing the 243 uses the same bullet
only reason I ask is I may have a calibre change soon