Brithunter
Well-Known Member
I haven't got a rifle in mind yet, but I have had a chat to Ross Haygarth. He can build a rifle in any of these calibres, with a glass bedded action for less than a Heym, which is what I had been thinking about.
Brithunter - Do you have any preferance, if you were to choose only one of your rifles?
My main concern with the 25-06 is that I have heard a few stories of deer running on when hit, whereas I have been told the 7x57 will deal with anything
Ahhh steve that is difficult as the three rifles are very different. The 7x57 is a BSA CF2 and the one I chose to take the US back in 2003, didn't have the 25-06 back then, but I did already have the 6.5x55 which is a sporterised Swedish Mauser. It's drawback is the flag safety still fitted
which I need to get changed at some point. The 25-06 is a Parker-Hale 1200C and it has quite nicely figured wood but darn that stock is heavy the rifle weighs about 9lbs. So it's not just about the cartridge but the whole package.Now the fastest that I have even seen a deer go down was a 4PT Roe Buck at about 700 yards using the 7x57 and RWS 173 Gr H-Mantle ammunition.
However I usually use handloads using 139 gr Hornady bullets. Logically the 7x57 is the most versatile of the three although it's a close run thing between it and the 6.5x55. The 25-06 has the smallest selection of bullet weights and also uses the most powder and with the prices today that must be considered. You will not doubt have noticed the .260 rem mentioned however I cannot see any advantage in the .260 and remember that the bullets need to be seated deeply in the 260 which further reduces the powder capacity. It's an attempt to re-invent the wheel as far as I am concerned.
Nonw of the three cartridges you originally asked about are bad choices and as I said I would find a nice rifle and see what it's chambered in.