I am offended every time I see Tony Blair on TV
can I complain about him and get an armed response team to give him an "inch by inch fingertip investigation"?!?
A member of the public phoned in to say they found the image threatening, can you believe it! Perhaps if these people who make such ridiculous accusations were made to pay for any action they want taken over such matters it would be a different story. How far will this anti nonsense be allowed to go, to say they felt threatened by an image in a newspaper and for it to receive this kind of response is beyond belief. So much of this rubbish makes the headlines that the Police are almost forced into dealing with it to avoid comebacks and then are made to look foolish as a result of their actions.
he's just a character that some people dislike and want to cause trouble for. He doesn't help himself though when he parades with deacts that might not be deactivated at all! how could you tell?
Problem is, that if the police truly believed that it wasn't deactivated, then there was little point in phoning him and telling him they were coming to inspect is there - in fact its quite clear that if they honestly believed he had a live SLR that he shouldn't have, then they would have been there in the early hours raiding him - therefore the polices insistence that they had to investigate it sounds increasingly hollow and dishonest, and their refusal to attend at a time of mutual convenience that would not affect his business becomes impossible to defend.
Am I the only one who found the police wish, to check if ALL the guns were de-activated, quite reasonable given his seeming disregard for the law.
Now we may or may not disagree with the law but I, at least, am glad that he was treated no different than if he had been "Mr" So and So than "Sir" So and So.
As an aside I see that Serjeant Nightingale is launching YET ANOTHER appeal. Did they teach him that when in a hole, neck deep in ****, it is best to stop digging?