Bergara b14 rifles after almost 10 years from the release, reliability/accuracy/durability/features!

randello88

Well-Known Member
Hello everyone, here i am again, last step before starting actually buying a lot of stuff in the process of building my next hunting rig. So, as far as the rifle goes, even if i am open to change my mind, i am leaning toward a B14 hunter in .308 (i would put it in a PSE composites e-lite stock) for my new build for many reasons (and price is not one of them) but it seems like recently, in forums, the bergara is considered a good budget rifle but the QC is not very good and, for example, Tikkas are a “much better” choice, “you can’t beat a tikka”, etc. At the same time, the majority of criticism towards bergara seem to come from who doesn’t own one and several posters on various forums, owning both a tikka and a Bergara, stated that they prefer the Bergara. So what’s the deal? For my hunting rifles i have always preferred a “cheaper” mass produced rifle because i think that these are very good tools, looking at function over cosmetics and being much more tested than less sold rifles, even much more expensive ones. For example, as my main knife i much prefer a cheap mora of sweden knife than a 400 euros luxury knife from a small brand simply because one is just a tool and it’s made to work, the other one goes beyond that and maybe the functionality has not been set as number one priority. The following points summarize how i think the bergara is in the main fields of what i consider important for a hunting rifle (reliability, accuracy, durability/overall quality, features):

-very good reliability with reliable feeding and ejection. Actually b14 actions seem among the most reliable in factory rifles on the market from what i read and experienced. While for example i have heard of many feeding issues with rifles from many brands, i have never heard any problem with B14 actions cycling.

-very good accuracy. I have seen some reports of b14s being pretty picky with ammo but even more reports saying the contrary. My B14 is pretty picky with ammo, but for me a 1.5 MOA group is a bad group so everything depends on the standards of the owner when calling a group “bad”. My b14 hunter, despite the 1:12 twist, seems to hate 150 gr ammo and shoots very well (0.3-0.6 MOA) RWS DK 165 gr and Geco teilmantel 170 gr.

-Good construction quality. It’s not a premium level quality, of course, but to me the Bergara seems to be a rifle built good enough to be considered good to go for any practical application and, since i consider hunting rifles “tools”, i don’t care much about refined cosmetic, finitures, etc. In other words, i don’t think the bergara b14 lacks build quality if you look at the functional side. I can feel it while holding a b14 and, for example, an xpr or a remington and also a cz 550: the bergara feels much more refined and solid and trigger, action and safety work very well. However, there have been some issues with the pot metal bolt shroud breaking or getting out of alignement in early 2018 models (like mine) but mostly with rifles shooting small primer 6.5 creedmore ammo (i have never heard of problems on a 308 rifle) and primers cratering (which, as i understood, is pretty common and it becomes an issue only in certain circumstances). These issues were not followed by a recall and seem to be pretty rare but bergara offers free MIM bolt shrouds to anyone owning a model produced before 2019.

-lot of features: for example, compared to a 1700 euros tikka t3x lite (yeah, in Italy a tikka t3x lite costs twice a b14 hunter), for example, a standard b14 comes with: factory cerakote treatment, no plastic parts (aside from the magazine), muzzle thread, better stock and recoil pad with more aftermarket support, better customer service. Bergaras and tikkas seem to have comparable accuracy (maybe a bit better with bergaras), trigger (maybe better on tikkas with the cheap trigger spring upgrade) and action (it is said the action is better on the Tikka but i tried both and i didn’t feel that much difference, both actions are very smooth).

What do you think about all this? I know this post is the definition of overthinking but we are here to discuss afterall, a passion is a passion because we invest in it definitely too much time and energies than we need! Also hunting season is closed here at the moment, otherwise i would be in my hills, stalking roes and boars ahah

p.s.: it would be great if, when replying, you could specify if you have any direct experience or not!
 
That’s a very long post.
My brother has a b14, I don’t think it’s a hunter as I think that’s the wooden one. He has the plastic one in 6.5x55. He has had it 10 years as his first cf. they had just come out I think and knowing he likes to buy something new and use it, I suggested this, supplied by brock and Norris.
He doesn’t get interested in any other rifles or calibres it shoots very well, he kills 20+ deer a year at some interesting distances and from some interesting situations, I doubt he will ever change it and I’m sure he will be shooting for the next 30 years.
If it helps on ammo, I doubt he considers different ammo has different results, he mixes up anything and would capably shoot deer at 200m with no concern or mistakes.
No recommendation either way.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kjf
That’s a very long post.
My brother has a b14, I don’t think it’s a hunter as I think that’s the wooden one. He has the plastic one in 6.5x55. He has had it 10 years as his first cf. they had just come out I think and knowing he likes to buy something new and use it, I suggested this, supplied by brock and Norris.
He doesn’t get interested in any other rifles of calibres it shoots very well, he kills 20+ deer a year at some interesting distances and from some interesting situations, I doubt he will ever change it and I’m sure he will be shooting for the next 30 years.
No recommendation either way.
And if you want a mora equivalent buy a savage. I love my savage.
 
Not wanting to be one of those people, but…I’ve used a Mauser M18 in .308 for nearly all of my stalking for a few years now, and have found it an excellent budget option. £600 new, shoots everything I put through it accurately and the QC seems very good.
 
That’s a very long post.
My brother has a b14, I don’t think it’s a hunter as I think that’s the wooden one. He has the plastic one in 6.5x55. He has had it 10 years as his first cf. they had just come out I think and knowing he likes to buy something new and use it, I suggested this, supplied by brock and Norris.
He doesn’t get interested in any other rifles or calibres it shoots very well, he kills 20+ deer a year at some interesting distances and from some interesting situations, I doubt he will ever change it and I’m sure he will be shooting for the next 30 years.
If it helps on ammo, I doubt he considers different ammo has different results, he mixes up anything and would capably shoot deer at 200m with no concern or mistakes.
No recommendation either way.
That's very long indeed, i had some time to kill between patients 😂

Btw thanks for sharing, your brother is lucky to be able to take so many deer every year. Me too for now, hope things don't change!
 
Not wanting to be one of those people, but…I’ve used a Mauser M18 in .308 for nearly all of my stalking for a few years now, and have found it an excellent budget option. £600 new, shoots everything I put through it accurately and the QC seems very good.
I have heard good things about the new "budget" Mausers. What turned me off on them was the absence of aftermarket stock options other than grs. I was very close to buy an M12, i am sure they are good rifles, maybe a bit overpriced but i could buy one soon or late
 
I have heard good things about the new "budget" Mausers. What turned me off on them was the absence of aftermarket stock options other than grs. I was very close to buy an M12, i am sure they are good rifles, maybe a bit overpriced but i could buy one soon or late
Boyds offer stocks for it too, but I’ve not felt the need to replace the factory one yet.
 
I have a Tikka T3 varmint stainless and a Bergara B14 HMR, both in 22-250 and both are excellent rifles
The Tikka has a slicker action and better stock trigger, but the Bergara has a much better stock and magazine
Accuracy wise, there's nothing in it - both shoot better than me


Cheers

Bruce
 
I have a Tikka T3 varmint stainless and a Bergara B14 HMR, both in 22-250 and both are excellent rifles
The Tikka has a slicker action and better stock trigger, but the Bergara has a much better stock and magazine
Accuracy wise, there's nothing in it - both shoot better than me


Cheers

Bruce
What about cycling reliability and ammo pickiness (does this word even exist? Ahah)?

What you don't like about the t3x magazine?

Also the fact that newer b14 come cerakoted is something interesting for me, i hunt in bad weather condition often
 
What about cycling reliability and ammo pickiness (does this word even exist? Ahah)?

What you don't like about the t3x magazine?

Also the fact that newer b14 come cerakoted is something interesting for me, i hunt in bad weather condition often
Never had a problem cycling rounds in either
I've never had any serious issues with the Tikka magazine but the bergara magazine just feels better made and because it's AICS compatible offers more scope for aftermarket replacement.
I changed the standard trigger in the Bergara to a TriggerTech and it's now as good, if not better than the Tikka
This is a 5 shot group with the Bergara at 100 yards using 50g Hornady V max
The scope was a Wulf 4k digital at x24 mag

4k target 1.webp

Cheers

Bruce
 
I’ve now owned 2 tikkas and a Bergara.

I have shot a lot of other tikkas also and never found one that doesn’t shoot cloverleafs consistently. The trigger is superb and can be adjusted with ease to a light crisp break. The stocks are in my opinion there worst feature.

The Bergara trigger was not as good so replaced with a timney and I still preferred the tikka. I also had a trigger guard/bottom metal that snapped in half. A replacement was sent to me efficiently from the importers.

In summary I don’t think you would be disappointed with either but for me the tikka wins.
 
Hello everyone, here i am again, last step before starting actually buying a lot of stuff in the process of building my next hunting rig. So, as far as the rifle goes, even if i am open to change my mind, i am leaning toward a B14 hunter in .308 (i would put it in a PSE composites e-lite stock) for my new build for many reasons (and price is not one of them) but it seems like recently, in forums, the bergara is considered a good budget rifle but the QC is not very good and, for example, Tikkas are a “much better” choice, “you can’t beat a tikka”, etc. At the same time, the majority of criticism towards bergara seem to come from who doesn’t own one and several posters on various forums, owning both a tikka and a Bergara, stated that they prefer the Bergara. So what’s the deal? For my hunting rifles i have always preferred a “cheaper” mass produced rifle because i think that these are very good tools, looking at function over cosmetics and being much more tested than less sold rifles, even much more expensive ones. For example, as my main knife i much prefer a cheap mora of sweden knife than a 400 euros luxury knife from a small brand simply because one is just a tool and it’s made to work, the other one goes beyond that and maybe the functionality has not been set as number one priority. The following points summarize how i think the bergara is in the main fields of what i consider important for a hunting rifle (reliability, accuracy, durability/overall quality, features):

-very good reliability with reliable feeding and ejection. Actually b14 actions seem among the most reliable in factory rifles on the market from what i read and experienced. While for example i have heard of many feeding issues with rifles from many brands, i have never heard any problem with B14 actions cycling.

-very good accuracy. I have seen some reports of b14s being pretty picky with ammo but even more reports saying the contrary. My B14 is pretty picky with ammo, but for me a 1.5 MOA group is a bad group so everything depends on the standards of the owner when calling a group “bad”. My b14 hunter, despite the 1:12 twist, seems to hate 150 gr ammo and shoots very well (0.3-0.6 MOA) RWS DK 165 gr and Geco teilmantel 170 gr.

-Good construction quality. It’s not a premium level quality, of course, but to me the Bergara seems to be a rifle built good enough to be considered good to go for any practical application and, since i consider hunting rifles “tools”, i don’t care much about refined cosmetic, finitures, etc. In other words, i don’t think the bergara b14 lacks build quality if you look at the functional side. I can feel it while holding a b14 and, for example, an xpr or a remington and also a cz 550: the bergara feels much more refined and solid and trigger, action and safety work very well. However, there have been some issues with the pot metal bolt shroud breaking or getting out of alignement in early 2018 models (like mine) but mostly with rifles shooting small primer 6.5 creedmore ammo (i have never heard of problems on a 308 rifle) and primers cratering (which, as i understood, is pretty common and it becomes an issue only in certain circumstances). These issues were not followed by a recall and seem to be pretty rare but bergara offers free MIM bolt shrouds to anyone owning a model produced before 2019.

-lot of features: for example, compared to a 1700 euros tikka t3x lite (yeah, in Italy a tikka t3x lite costs twice a b14 hunter), for example, a standard b14 comes with: factory cerakote treatment, no plastic parts (aside from the magazine), muzzle thread, better stock and recoil pad with more aftermarket support, better customer service. Bergaras and tikkas seem to have comparable accuracy (maybe a bit better with bergaras), trigger (maybe better on tikkas with the cheap trigger spring upgrade) and action (it is said the action is better on the Tikka but i tried both and i didn’t feel that much difference, both actions are very smooth).

What do you think about all this? I know this post is the definition of overthinking but we are here to discuss afterall, a passion is a passion because we invest in it definitely too much time and energies than we need! Also hunting season is closed here at the moment, otherwise i would be in my hills, stalking roes and boars ahah

p.s.: it would be great if, when replying, you could specify if you have any direct experience or not!
Shot both, now only have Tikkas.

In my opinion, Bergeras are rougher round the edges - fit and finish just isn’t as good. And was never able to get the same accuracy. Trigger definitely clunkier.

They’re ‘fine’, but definitely the more agricultural of the two.
 
Never had a problem cycling rounds in either
I've never had any serious issues with the Tikka magazine but the bergara magazine just feels better made and because it's AICS compatible offers more scope for aftermarket replacement.
I changed the standard trigger in the Bergara to a TriggerTech and it's now as good, if not better than the Tikka
This is a 5 shot group with the Bergara at 100 yards using 50g Hornady V max
The scope was a Wulf 4k digital at x24 mag

View attachment 306895

Cheers

Bruce
Hi Bruce, that group is not reassuring for deer ahah. Thanks for sharing your experience
 
I’ve now owned 2 tikkas and a Bergara.

I have shot a lot of other tikkas also and never found one that doesn’t shoot cloverleafs consistently. The trigger is superb and can be adjusted with ease to a light crisp break. The stocks are in my opinion there worst feature.

The Bergara trigger was not as good so replaced with a timney and I still preferred the tikka. I also had a trigger guard/bottom metal that snapped in half. A replacement was sent to me efficiently from the importers.

In summary I don’t think you would be disappointed with either but for me the tikka wins.
How did the trigger guard broke? That's weird, that's not an area were so much stressed is applied normally
 
How did the trigger guard broke? That's weird, that's not an area were so much stressed is applied normally
Whilst cleaning undid the 2 action screws and it snapped right in half, looked like a cast piece of metal that had a void inside creating a weak spot
 
Btw guys, i know tikkas are very good rifles and maybe i was wrong taking it as an example! While comparison with any rifle brand other than Bergara, tikka included, are more than welcome, i wish this didn't become the usual "tikka vs bergara" thread cause i already know where it would go. Again, i am sure tikkas are very reliable and they have good qc but i don't wanna this thread to become victim of the extreme popularity of tikkas. I am sure tikkas have a huge fan base for a reason but, when people start saying they are basically perfect with a better trigger than a trigger tech or that they are all talk drivers with, at the same time, a lot of threads on various forum reporting accuracy issues or mechanical problems, i start thinking that yes, it's a good rifle, but people tend to overrate it based on it being popular and fashionable. It's always nice to be able to say "my rifle must be perfect because it's a tikka and everyone says so" but lemons exist for any mass produced rifle and tikkas are sold for 600 usd in the US. Ok, they save some money on the stock, but at that price it's just impossible to have perfect testing and QC so when people say tikkas are perfection i understand that there is some kind of bias! I would love unbiased opinions based on experience and with motivated answers :)
Sorry for the OT
 
Back
Top