I think that 6p does raise a debatable point. I have a BMH that is more than capable of successfully tracking old tracks but not once in a practical situation have I had to use these powers. The dog will indicate the presence of unseen deer and if I do happen to have a mishap he will locate the wounded/normally dead deer but I certainly will not be hanging about 12 plus hours after the mishap just so that he can prove that he can follow a cold trail. Now if I came to the conclusion that I had no use for the dog's ability to cold track and did not develop this side of the dog am I really not a worthy owner of a BMH, can I not conclude that my dog is a working dog. On the other hand I can see the side which says that this breed of dog has been specifically developed over generations to be an expert in cold tracking, we must keep that ability at the fore and only breed from stock that can be proved to possess that ability.
I am not a BMH owner as most of you gents know but a GWP owner.
My view on this is similar to Davie’s, the total obsession with tracking an old trail is of little value here in the UK. While I appreciate that it is a test and like so much in life once you get a couple of enthusiasts together some individuals will have to have a some form of competition to prove “my dog is better than yours” then the winner can make more money from its next breeding because he has won this or that test.
I have tracked a 24h hour old trail for 2 Km with an 18 month old GWP is that good or bad for a tracking exam? I haven’t a clue. For every hour my dog has spent tracking for myself and other syndicate members it has spent 100 or more using air scent to find un-seen deer for me, I would guess that any working dog with a bit of nose could find a deer on a hot trail up to 30 minutes old, which if the dog is working for me is all that would be necessary.
As said most deer shot here are stalked not driven, there is no practical advantage having a dog that can track a 48 hour trail, if it has took you or the person who made the cock up that long to get on the trail the people involved need to look to themselves to why they have left the animal suffering for so long. In most cases a 12 hour trail should be the oldest you need to follow, normal when tracking a deer shot at last night but followed up in the morning. There is far more to a stalking dog than following a trail, unless you really are that a poor shot. For the guys that stalk in England how far could most of them practically track a deer before they came to a boundary fence or main road?
I was told recently that in one tracking test held here in the UK was won by a 10 year old GWP, beating all the BMH and Hanover’s, the owner is a member on here and one of the best trainers in the UK IMO. Having the right dog is only part of the equation.
IMO some of hound owners seem to be blindly exhorting the value of the ability to track while completely ignoring what values the average UK deer stalker requires from his deer dog.
ATB
Tahr


Kevin F do you also think that the gwp should be made to quarter on a moor and hold point...
Kevin F do you also think that the gwp should be made to quarter on a moor and hold point. Do you also think that a terrier should also be placed to ground on a regular basis just to prove it can. I am not against the tests and can understand there being i will encorage my wee bitch to follow a line but just for a bit of fun so that i can talk the talk with the tweed skirted ladys that seem to jump on any new working breed, These tests will give them a reason to strutt.
I do wounder what these well trained dogs would be like if they EVER get the chance to follow a wounded deer and need to deal with it also the owners faces when they need to get a knife our of there ample knickers to bring a swift end to a good track.
I will keep every one informed on my pup,s progress warts and all.!!![]()
There is nothing wrong with finding a deer you have shot on a hot track. Lets face it 99% of tracking is just that. Of course Uk tracking will evolve into its own form just like Swedish tracking has evolved to cover the game we hunt and the way we hunt.
Lets face it UK stalking has evolved into its own model that has taken bits from other countries ways and traditions to make it its own.
The UK do's not have so many Rta's to follow up like we do in Scandinavia where its compulsory to report Rta's. Nearly 50000 call outs for tracking last year if my memory serves me right. Many of these tracks would be cold tracks many hours old.
My point is why have a tracking dog that has not been trained to its full potenial. If you only have to track a cold track a couple of times in the dogs life then the training has been worth doing.
1 lost deer is a lost deer to many.
All this drivel spouted by 6p obout bits of paper and the way a dogs is trained is just ignorance on his part about how you TRAIN a dog to a reasonable level.

Inverware i dont think so mate i think your well off the mark why would any one train a dog to bark at a deer till they get there when they are already on the end of a lead. Or why train them to bring a bit of leather strap back to show they had found the deer after they find when they are attached to a harness.God should you people really have dogs at all.
Its not the dogs that are the problem getting to the top level but there owners. inver are yours trained in any of the disaplines you discribe.![]()
Does that mean I should not get a BMH or HS? Not in my opinion it doesn't...
Inverware i dont think so mate i think your well off the mark why would any one train a dog to bark at a deer till they get there when they are already on the end of a lead. Or why train them to bring a bit of leather strap back to show they had found the deer after they find when they are attached to a harness.God should you people really have dogs at all.
Its not the dogs that are the problem getting to the top level but there owners. inver are yours trained in any of the disaplines you discribe.![]()