NickJ
Well-Known Member
British Quality Wild Venison Standard webinar
Thinking about applying for the British Quality Wild Venison Standard or just want to know more?

I agree and have spoken about this. It is quite clear that red deer taste way different than muntjac. So why lump them the same when you dont know what you are buying. Maybe BQV can answer that question if they are the top of the trade.Why is it all labelled as venison and not sold as either munty, roe, fallow, or red / sika?
I agree and have spoken about this. It is quite clear that red deer taste way different than muntjac. So why lump them the same when you dont know what you are buying. Maybe BQV can answer that question if they are the top of the trade.
Didn’t this run to about 8 pages last time with no positive outcomes?!![]()
British Quality Wild Venison Standard webinar
Thinking about applying for the British Quality Wild Venison Standard or just want to know more?www.eventbrite.com
They cancelled the last webinarDidn’t this run to about 8 pages last time with no positive outcomes?!
We could see this happening years ago the chaps on the lowland deer panel asked the question. At that time there were only Red deer areas and chiller that met the standard. Not sure if its change put i would guess its still strongly leads to the reds from FLS and a few chosen estates up here.It seems to be all about accreditation for the big supply chains (FC > AGHE > supermarket).
The smaller producer-processors are completely left out in the cold, ineligible to participate
It'll create a "two tier market", and should be strongly opposed by most of us.
Or could you argue that it will help the big boys get wild venison into supermarkets (where over 85% of meat is bought in the UK) thus helping create a market that currently doesn't exist, remember in Scotland many of the smaller dealers sell to the big supply chainsIt seems to be all about accreditation for the big supply chains (FC > AGHE > supermarket).
The smaller producer-processors are completely left out in the cold, ineligible to participate
It'll create a "two tier market", and should be strongly opposed by most of us.
Nope. I couldn't argue that.Or could you argue that it will help the big boys get wild venison into supermarkets thus helping create a market that currently doesn't exist
Highland Game is a nationwide concern, not restricted to Scotland. They're buying large quantities of wild carcasses from Forestry England for supply into supermarkets. Waitrose primarily, I believe? That chain of supply will be eligible for accreditation, despite the obvious opportunities for traceability and quality lapses that are inherent with the supply of large quantities from diverse sources, and extended storage, handling and transport, whereas the local man supplying local consumers with small quantities of fresh local produce will be denied accreditation. It's bonkers.That venison in the supermarkets is predominately farmed though right?
I'm trying to understand their thinking behind the scheme, not defending it, am assuming they feel if they can create demand from supermarkets for wild then the likes of Holme Park in England (the supermarkets will always try and buy from as few sources as possible) could buy from the smaller dealers as happens with Highland Game in Scotland
I agree that the scheme has ignored the needs of the smaller outfits (and thus the majority of the market.)
Didn't know Waitrose were stocking wild sorry, we don't have Waitroses up hereHighland Game is a nationwide concern, not restricted to Scotland. They're buying large quantities of wild carcasses from Forestry England for supply into supermarkets. Waitrose primarily, I believe? That chain of supply will be eligible for accreditation, despite the obvious opportunities for traceability and quality lapses that are inherent with the supply of large quantities from diverse sources, and extended storage, handling and transport, whereas the local man supplying local consumers with small quantities of fresh local produce will be denied accreditation. It's bonkers.
All they need to do is remove the need for carcasses to pass through an AGHE.Didn't know Waitrose were stocking wild sorry, we don't have Waitroses up here
Fully agree they need to look at an extension to this or other scheme for smaller suppliers, something we can all lobby for, starting at the webinar
Hopefully you can join the webinar and put those questions to themAll they need to do is remove the need for carcasses to pass through an AGHE.
Although in actual fact, the whole scheme is pointless as we already have compliance and inspections via our local EHO as a result of being registered as food businesses. So why add a whole nother layer of beaurocracy for no gain? And why add an additional cost, when our EHO inspections are free? The cost of accreditation itself will be enough to make it unattainable for many small producers, even if they were eligible to sign up.
The idea should be scrapped forthwith, and existing regulations should be properly applied and adhered to by all.
Waitrose isn't wild.Highland Game is a nationwide concern, not restricted to Scotland. They're buying large quantities of wild carcasses from Forestry England for supply into supermarkets. Waitrose primarily, I believe? That chain of supply will be eligible for accreditation, despite the obvious opportunities for traceability and quality lapses that are inherent with the supply of large quantities from diverse sources, and extended storage, handling and transport, whereas the local man supplying local consumers with small quantities of fresh local produce will be denied accreditation. It's bonkers.
Agreed, correctly administer what we have in place already, no need for this scheme at all.The idea should be scrapped forthwith, and existing regulations should be properly applied and adhered to by all.