Only if you let them…..Entitled or not, that’s what they do
Only if you let them…..Entitled or not, that’s what they do
What act says dsc is required for deer calibres? They still do it“Seven days you say? Where precisely in the act is that stated please?”
Its all a try on. They get away with it if people dont contest itWhat act says dsc is required for deer calibres? They still do it![]()
100% correct but what do folk do ? Roll overIts all a try on. They get away with it if people dont contest it
When I applied for my certificate, I wasn’t told to get DSC but I already had it booked because a permission I had required it. The firearms officer was impressed with this, I had all my permissions printed off and signed highlighting all boundaries.What act says dsc is required for deer calibres? They still do it![]()
Ok thanks, seems a pointless task I’ve got approval for a 6.5, notified the police I’ve sold my current rifle common sense would say safe to have another.
That’s great but nowhere in guidance does it mention dsc , FEOs who refuse to grant without it should be taken to taskWhen I applied for my certificate, I wasn’t told to get DSC but I already had it booked because a permission I had required it. The firearms officer was impressed with this, I had all my permissions printed off and signed highlighting all boundaries.
He didn’t even check my cabinet, quick chat check my paperwork job done.
I totally understand rifles in the wrong hands are very very dangerous. But I think if you are prepared and don’t give them a reason to say no it’s not that bad of a process
( I’ve found that with my limited dealings with humberside)
I agree with you ,but I do think beating them at their own game is sometimes easier. Be 100% prepared and have answers to questions before they are askedThat’s great but nowhere in guidance does it mention dsc , FEOs who refuse to grant without it should be taken to task
How are you beating them if complying with unnecessary demands ?I agree with you ,but I do think beating them at their own game is sometimes easier. Be 100% prepared and have answers to questions before they are asked
I do think there's something about the firearms manager, Chief Officer, big decision maker, whoever, can make any requests or conditions relating to the FAC, and you can't appeal them.That’s great but nowhere in guidance does it mention dsc , FEOs who refuse to grant without it should be taken to task
They don’t want you to have firearms so if I have everything in place needed or not ,they can’t make it harder because I’ve got all the boxes ticked.How are you beating them if complying with unnecessary demands ?
Pointing him to the guidelines is also hard for him to say no , the simple question “ can you point me out in the guidelines where it says I need dsc “ should workThey don’t want you to have firearms so if I have everything in place needed or not ,they can’t make it harder because I’ve got all the boxes ticked.
I understand what you are saying
“ why should we have to do unnecessary tasks”Beating them at their own game is maybe the wrong phrase. But if PC plod is set on making it difficult with questions and I’m prepared for all eventualities it’s making it hard for him to say no
Like this bit:Pointing him to the guidelines is also hard for him to say no , the simple question “ can you point me out in the guidelines where it says I need dsc “ should work
Seems to give a wide carte blanche. Not specific to the DSC, but it could include mentoring or anything else.HO Guidance said:10.11.... chief officers of police may impose other conditions appropriate to individual circumstances.
I get that but to me it’s a cop out if we don’t challenge things where does it end ?Like this bit:
Seems to give a wide carte blanche. Not specific to the DSC, but it could include mentoring or anything else.
I agree with you on challenging, but they can use this as a get out of jail card, so to speak, in this instance.I get that but to me it’s a cop out if we don’t challenge things where does it end ?
If you read post #25 again (ie, the post that you were responding to) you will see that @MarkL made it quite clear that he was NOT told that he would have to get DSC1.That’s great but nowhere in guidance does it mention dsc ,
Absolutely they should., FEOs who refuse to grant without it should be taken to task
Received email off Humberside police asking for £47 because I’ve gone over the 7 days notice.,There's no time limit (up to the expiry of the certificate) for the 1-4-1 and that's written in the Guidance.
A polite email asking why they seem it necessary to go against the Guidance (seen as best practice) usually gets them to toe the line, especially if they have to write it down.
No one wants to admit to doing it wrong in writing.
Hate to say I told you so. Are you going to pay?Received email off Humberside police asking for £47 because I’ve gone over the 7 days notice.,
I contacted BASC and they said yes this is correct
The guidance says 7 days or a reasonable time period the time period is left to the discretion of the individual force.
I sent a reply saying could they clarify what they deem a reasonable time period.Hate to say I told you so. Are you going to pay?