Is it not around £150 per day for pointers at falconry? Best to avoid the money but if you must the same price as fixing a switch in ranger 22 larder.
thanks. anybody using security dogs
Ask David Beckham he's just hired some.
What does the other guy 'need' the dog for? To find deer that he is likely to wound/lose? To be a companion in the field? To use to alert him to the presence of deer? If it is all three - he may as well buy a pup and have the pleasure of training it.
I go back to something I said a little while ago - I am still prepared to be shot down for it - If he 'needs' it purely to find wounded/lost deer, it should not be a regular requirement for the guy and he may need to re-zero his rifle..
Exactly right!!! For some reason this attitude don't win many popularity contests tho…. if you're not sure of drop dead in the tracks shot… You shouldn't pull the trigger…. Tickles me when folks start up with the "he was dead, just didn't know it for 200 yards"...
Plus it will be a requirement of best practice and both out of season & night licence.chaps, the guy in question is an FC wildlife ranger if I’m not mistaken, and they now have to have a trained deer dog, ironically as they probably shoot more deer than most and wound/lose fewer than most too, especially proportionally. The chap needs a dog for his job, not because he needs to necessarily find lots of wounded deer.
I do agree with the sentiment in a wider context, but not in this case.
OMG! you can tell how little some people have done in the way of number of deer killed by what they say. Last year I shot a few hundred deer, one deer I had to rely on the dog to catch and kill after a shot went wrong(nowt wrong with the zero, I just had not noticed a bonsai shrub in front of the beast in the poor light) . I am pleased I had the trained dog for that purpose and that moment alone. However it was also a benefit to have the dogs stalking along aside me indicating deer that I had not seen until the dogs pointed them out. Also the times that they helped me find the dead deer quickly enabling me to get on and kill some more.
chaps, the guy in question is an FC wildlife ranger if I’m not mistaken, and they now have to have a trained deer dog, ironically as they probably shoot more deer than most and wound/lose fewer than most too, especially proportionally. The chap needs a dog for his job, not because he needs to necessarily find lots of wounded deer.
I do agree with the sentiment in a wider context, but not in this case.
Correct, we must have a dog for deer. I shot several hundred deer last year. Can’t recall my dog having to track and dispatch any but over his life time he would of tracked and dispatched less than half a dozen.He would of found several that I couldn’t locate.

Why so many? Is that your job? Wildlife manager? Who tells you how many and what you have to kill?
Not a challenge, just curious…. In our revier, it's a three year plan that needs to be met. Don't know the exact number… But in an area that I almost leased, on 50 hectare, the yearly plan was 6 buck, 4 doe, and 4 young…. Roe deer…
I guess with the numbers you are talking, % is on your side. I still stick to what I said, but understand a slip now and then...
alone? or can you take others out? I guess if you have to do it every day, it's no longer a hunting trip to look forward to…
how long have you been doing it? Interesting…..