Range finder recommendations please?

twoseventy

Well-Known Member
Looking for a range finder, not looking to spend a fortune but in the same light i don't want to skimp and end up stuck with something that won't do the job.

What do you all recommend?

​Nathan
 
I have a Leica LRF 800 and whilst a bit 'boxy' these days it has provided faultless service.

Newer generation gear is much more compact but I just dont have the cash spare to indulge. However, I client earlier this year turned up with a very neat compact unit. A little strangely it sported a leather 'sleeve'. On closer look it was a new generation Leica.

I'm not sure the current RRP on the Leica hunting models, but this unit was the Pin Master - designed for golfers. Hence the leather cover - it was a dimpled effect white. BUT - he'd got it from n Internet Golf Shop in Germany - posted to the UK for something significantly South of the £200 mark all in.
 
I use a Leupold RX-600. All the features you need, none that you don't. Simple, not expensive and compact.
 
Leica all the way got one it works flawlessly, you shouldnt need thousands of yards for normal shooting, more expensive of course
 
Thanks for the feedback so far. I've used a Leupold range finder and liked it very much, but this was several years ago now, and knowing how technology moves on i wanted to see if there had been any huge improvements before i part with my hard earned.
 
i bought a swarovski 8x30 range finder its was not cheap but it is superb, i dont use binos now because the optics are good enough to use it for spotting as well
 
I have a Zeiss 8x26PRF, optics are brilliant and as it has a full size eyepiece it can be used for spotting, previously I had Bushnells which were ok, but I did have to ping a target a few times as the laser had a broad beam, I think Leica have the narrowest beam so have a good reputation but the Zeiss are Swaro like 223 above says can be used instead of binos
 
I've had the Leica 800 boxy job then the Swarovski 8x30 then the Leicester compact 1200 and they are all excellent.

​moved on to the Swarovski 8x42 RF binos and they are superb.
 
I have a Bushnell Scout 1000. I wanted a range finder to play with but didn't want to spend a fortune and found this on offer somewhere for less than they were selling 2nd hand. Given that I thought if I didn't like it I could sell it again and not lose any money. I've been happy with it and it has done my job and I'd probably still get most of my money back on it.

It has done everything I need of it however claims of 1000 yard ranging are, basically, a lie in the real world. I've ranged a white painted house gable at over 800 yards but you'll not be ranging non-reflective targets like trees or deer at that sort of distance. It will range non-reflective targets like trees and deer in the 400 - 600 range and grass banks out to maybe 700 yards.

The glass is built to the American optical standard, which is to say it's awful in low light and not great in daylight. Despite this I've always been able to get a useful range even when shooting sika in forestry at last light, usually there is some landmark you can see and range when necessary. Also the display is LCD rather than LED and so hard to read in low light against a dark background - the easy solution to this is to range something and then point the range finder at the brighter sky to read the result.

Despite these comments I'd have another one but I'd shop around carefully. The other option, to buy a quality European unit second hand, is not so attractive with rangefinders as with binos and the like just because electronics do fail and even most of the "big names" will only stand over the rangefinder electronics for 5 years which must tell you something about the expected failure rate. I've no idea of the cost of repair but would guess it would be considerable. So, a 2nd hand quality unit is probably not quite such a good deal as something like binos but even so well worth considering and, as with all these things, you might get one that would work for another 20 years.
 
I have a Nikon Riflehunter 1000 which I reckoned was the best quality/price/facilities from the reviews I could find.

It offers yards or meters, close or far target (useful in a wood). You can choose to measure point to point or at the touch of a button the internal inclinometer will calculate the horizontal distance to compensate when shooting up or down, I normally leave it switched to calculate for angle.

It changes automatically from black to an orange display so that you can read it in lower light conditions. Handy in a dingy wood or dusk and dawn. It can also give a running readout for a few seconds.


In use it seems fine. As a real world example I can read off a telephone pole at 259metres which has a tree behind it at 279 / 285 (depending what bit you aim at!) so it is very precise, the pole is thinner than the cross hairs. I did modify it with a rubber cup eye piece which makes it easier to use single handed, I posted that here a year or so ago.

It was under 300 pounds. They do a Riflehunter 500 as well, I had mine from Optics warehouse.

Everybody posting here seems to be happy with the one they own so it would appear to be they all do their job okay. Consider the sort of stalking you do and base your choice for the suitability of that.

I take it with me if I am going to sit in a new high seat or explore new land. But mainly I bought it to learn how to assess distance without one! I take it when walking the dogs in order to check my range guess to a feature that I can't pace to, across a gulley or valley for example.


If you can afford them, the rangefinder binoculars would appear to be the best bet.

Alan
 
Last edited:
Back
Top