Surely even if it’s a let day, a cull is a cull be it stags or hinds?
Nope.
An effective cull is shooting as many animals as possible in the shortest amount of time, using as few resources as possible. It would be great to be selective with each deer shot, but reality often gets in the way.
Hind stalking has always played two important roles on a sporting estate:
1. Thinning the herd down to a manageable level where reproduction (sometimes called recruitment) rates do not outstrip the carrying capacity (feed) of the ground. Artificial feeding during the winter is an indication that there are problems.
2. Useful time for training the next generation of stalkers, often serving as ghillies during the stag season. They will have an idea of where deer prefer to feed and lie up in certain conditions, which is more than half the game anyway. So the rest of the task is much like what the DSC2 tried to be, but never achieved.
Anyway, estates have suffered primarily due to landowners not having enough cash to run them properly. All should be factoring them in as a year on year 'loss' (in financial terms) but this expenditure should translate into a general improvement of the grounds and staff (much like a football club!).
In recent times, revenue has been sought through various means, such as government grants/tax breaks of deer slaying and
non-native tree planting forestry, woodland creation etc. Another being wind turbines. I don't agree with any of these, as they alter the landscape and don't really improve the ground.
The death knell of an estate is selling hind stalking, as you can't make proper money off a day at hind's anyway ('trophy hind' fees anyone?).
Unless you happen to have a team of 'guests/rifles' who are happy to leave the lodge at 5am and return after dark, help with lardering (i.e mop the floors) and have an early night to do it again the next day, you are wasting time, and hence money.
Might get a few 'but I do that, and gladly pay for the opportunity' responses to the above. Well, that shows you have been taken advantage of by the factor, who is failling to employ staff that receieve experience, training and payment for their work. The only way forward for such an estate is to bin the factor, and possibly the owner too, and find someone with enough capital who appreciates what can be achieved with proper management and not exploitation.
Sadly, I think these days are over, if not fast approaching the end.