I have been told many a time, "if you see a spiker, shoot it first because when it fights other bucks in the rut it stabs them in the eyes, face, neck, rather than the tines engaging".
I was out a month ago and saw a spiker fighting with a 3 year old Roe that had a reasonable head - surprisingly the spiker beat the bigger animal: it was in an unsafe location to shoot it, but this evening I saw the spiker out again with a backdrop so dropped the beast.
After the farmer asked, "what's a spiker", I thought about this, and wondered if the advice I used to set my priorities is correct.
Searching online identifies that many US states ban shooting spikers on the basis that if the spiker makes it to the next year, it may have a good rack on its head.
US deer websites state that being a spiker is a 1.5 year to 2.5 year old deer (not sure how 0.5 works out, as Roe are born all at the same time, and never in winter), tends to mean slower growing antlers (they look long to me), perhaps a late born deer (Roe, late born?), poor nutrition (with fields full of crops?), and next year it could be a specimen deer. Spikers I see are small, much smaller than other deer the same age, so nutrition may be a part, or is it just genetics?
What do you think? Is the US advice specific to their deer and their seasons, or is some of it relevant in the UK?
Bottom line should we shoot them on sight, or leave them to mature, while they do their mayhem?
I was out a month ago and saw a spiker fighting with a 3 year old Roe that had a reasonable head - surprisingly the spiker beat the bigger animal: it was in an unsafe location to shoot it, but this evening I saw the spiker out again with a backdrop so dropped the beast.
After the farmer asked, "what's a spiker", I thought about this, and wondered if the advice I used to set my priorities is correct.
Searching online identifies that many US states ban shooting spikers on the basis that if the spiker makes it to the next year, it may have a good rack on its head.
US deer websites state that being a spiker is a 1.5 year to 2.5 year old deer (not sure how 0.5 works out, as Roe are born all at the same time, and never in winter), tends to mean slower growing antlers (they look long to me), perhaps a late born deer (Roe, late born?), poor nutrition (with fields full of crops?), and next year it could be a specimen deer. Spikers I see are small, much smaller than other deer the same age, so nutrition may be a part, or is it just genetics?
What do you think? Is the US advice specific to their deer and their seasons, or is some of it relevant in the UK?
Bottom line should we shoot them on sight, or leave them to mature, while they do their mayhem?
Last edited:
![20250824212548[1].webp 20250824212548[1].webp](https://www.thestalkingdirectory.co.uk/data/attachments/387/387379-2e0da90724d6482e8304bd94ded4ab38.jpg?hash=5vm50EzXYQ)





