Starmer preps us for reaming

local dentist they have reduced their NHS slots

You are lucky. My dentist has shut up shop on all NHS work and I was with them for years as an NHS patient.

Oh, I can still go there...£65.00 for a non-specific check-up is the entry fee. It goes up from there...

Oh...and the waiting list for the only other local dentist still doing NHS work is horrendous.
 
most will benefit through our pension funds

Possibly not.

There is a huge drive to deliver "green" [over wealth] from pension investments. Billy Bragg is the poster boy for pouring hard-earned pension capital into NutZero projects.

The steward of my pension fund have sent multiple messages of intent on this matter and also polled the members specifically using SPI-B esque emotional arm-twisting and double-speak to get answers that say yes to this direction of travel.

Those of us who made appropriate provision for our dotage will fall victim of the fake taxes of our age.
 
Possibly not.

There is a huge drive to deliver "green" [over wealth] from pension investments. Billy Bragg is the poster boy for pouring hard-earned pension capital into NutZero projects.

The steward of my pension fund have sent multiple messages of intent on this matter and also polled the members specifically using SPI-B esque emotional arm-twisting and double-speak to get answers that say yes to this direction of travel.

Those of us who made appropriate provision for our dotage will fall victim of the fake taxes of our age.
Some of us are not yet of pension age and are trying to work out how to make enough just cover the day to day let alone have enough to pay into a pension pot.
 
It might therefore be germaine to consider whether we can actually afford such pointless squandering of our treasure on such impossibilities and vainglorious, virtue-signalling yet wholly redundant and plain daft projects as I have outlined above: basic laws of physics prevent it from ever succeeding; the best way to build wealth in the nation is to first stop wasting what we have, and build sensibly on realistic and achievable investments - replaceable energy sources are not in this category - ask Keir to ask Olaf while he’s there…
 
Someone please tell me how this it morally right & the cost to tax payers, fortunately I don’t need the winter fuel payment but when I see & hear things like this I bloody well want it.


I'm sure I read somewhere that the empty, 5000 "Stand by" hotel rooms are costing in excess of £400,000 per day, or £146,000,000 per year and they've stopped my £100 per year!!
 
Listening to Radio 4 at lunchtime. A few years ago the government took 5p per litre of petrol and diesel. This was supposed to be passed onto to us consumers at the pump price.

Has it happened? Of course not. Its been kept by the fuel companies who are recording high profits. Normally you would expect a high degree of competition within the market to keep them honest. Competitions and Markets Authority would in the past have had a view.

It is expected that 5p will be put back on by the new Government. It will be interesting to see what happens to fuel prices.

And I wonder if electric car drivers will be asked to contribute - especially those who recharge at home.
 
Labour

Hard at work screwing your country

From the article:

Meanwhile, with many selling their equities as fast they can, the London stock market will perform dismally, making it even harder than it already is for companies to raise capital.

Perhaps worst of all, it will deter the foreign investment Britain desperately needs if it is to have any hope of boosting growth. After all, why pay 40pc or more on capital gains in the UK when France only levies 19pc on properties not classed as a main home. Belgium levies capital gains at 16.5pc, and Switzerland levies nothing at all on private financial returns.

Add it all up, and one point is surely clear. We will get little, if any, of the gain from the tax raid, because people are sensitive to these changes. But we will get all of the pain. In reality, it has already flopped — and will just worsen the fiscal crunch the country faces.

 
Labour

Hard at work screwing your country

From the article:




Would be truly frightening selling a business in the next four years if you haven't protected yourself. All these muppets are going to do is cause a capital flight, pound will hit the floor and we will need to go cap in hand to the EU or IMF begging for a hand out… oh wait that’s there plan with closer ties to Europe anyway.
 
We spent 2 weeks on the Island if Ithica back in July and we're amazed by the number of Australians there. Got talking to many of them and without exception they were far from complementary about their current Left-leaning Government.

Exactly the same narrative experienced by our Duaghter who is just back from a 2-month tour of Oz.

K
 
Lack of freedom of movement is also seriously hindering British businesses ability to do business in Europe. The ability to move to staff around without all the BS of having to get visas is paramount.

Much of UK export is skills and advisory work. Those of us with just UK passports are pretty much useless now to firms that are working across Europe. Those with joint EU and UK passports are being paid a premium.

So my niece (with a UK and French passport) - a new graduate is on a starting salary of £35k working in a design business with offices in UK and France. My daughter, same age, better qualified and more experience was due to start in another design business with operations in UK and Portugal - they want her to work in both places. But she just has a UK passport and too much hassle to get a portuguese visa - they have been trying for three months - so are taking on a dual national instead.
Ive worked across Europe before and after Brexit and it has made no difference at all other than standing in an airport queue for 5 mins longer but it made absolutely no difference at all for me working, As long as you travel with a valid UK passport it never made any difference and I done my job for various European companies for 30yrs.
 
Labour

Hard at work screwing your country

From the article:
The Telegraph

Assiduously protecting the interests of the well-off.

From another article . . ;)

Earned income taxed twice as heavily as capital gains for some in UK, study finds

A graduate earning £35,000 a year pays almost double the average tax of someone with the same income from rent on property, according to a study of inequality in the UK tax system.


The combined effect of income tax and national insurance payments forces people in employment to pay much higher rates of tax than those who benefit from lower capital gains tax (CGT) rates on property and shares income, according to the Intergenerational Foundation thinktank.

In a separate example that also emphasises the gap between the mainly older people who generate an income from property and shares and those who rely on employment, a person receiving £60,000 a year in the form of capital gains or dividends pays less tax than someone aged 16 to 64 in a job earning £35,000.

“Earned income, in such cases, is taxed two to four times more heavily than unearned income,” said the foundation, an independent charity that funds research into issues affecting young people.

Based on analysis of HMRC data, the foundation said increasing CGT rates to the same level as rates on earned income would raise at least £10bn extra a year, allowing the government to cut tax rates at each income tax threshold by at least 1.25 percentage points.

The momentum behind calls for the equalisation of capital and employment tax rates has grown in recent years. Recent polling has shown support across the political spectrum, with 61% overall saying they back reform.
Before it was scrapped, the Office of Tax Simplification said the tax system would be better designed if the rates for CGT and income tax were more closely aligned. It said putting CGT up to the level of income tax would raise £14bn.

The former Conservative chancellor Nigel Lawson set the rates of CGT at the same level as income tax in 1988, saying: “In principle, there is little economic difference between [earned] income and capital gains ... And in so far as there is a difference, it is by no means clear why one should be taxed more heavily than the other.”

Since Lawson’s time in office, capital gains have risen 16 times from below £5bn a year to an estimated £80bn in the financial year 2020-21, but the amount of tax raised from capital gains has only risen three times to about £15bn.

Higher rate taxpayers earning more than just over £50,000 a year pay 42% on every extra pound earned from employment, but pay only 20% on gains from shares and 28% from gains on property.

Standard rate taxpayers, which includes most taxpayers over the age of 65, only pay 18% on property gains, 10% on gains from shares and 20% on rental income.

The authors said the current system allowed for significant levels of avoidance by those with income from capital gains who were allowed to smooth the declaration of their income to make sure it fell under the tax threshold over a period of years.

“The wealthy obtain two main advantages from the current system not available to most of the population: first, a large lump of tax-exempt capital gains; secondly, a maximum tax of 20%, which is less than half the top rate of income tax,” the report said.

“Those who can manipulate the tax system in their favour tend to be those with high incomes or high levels of wealth, leaving a larger tax burden on younger people and those on lower incomes, further perpetuating inequalities between and within generations,” it added.

The tax privileges granted to those with unearned income in the UK are also over- generous by European standards, the report said. “For example, in Germany the annual exempt allowance is only €1,000 and all capital gains are taxed at 26.4%, while in France unearned income is taxed at 30-34%.”
 
By the sounds of it, Starmer's attack on the pensioners is ruffling a lot of feathers, not least amongst his own parliamentary colleagues. He may well think that he's got such a majority so those who are against it don't matter. But it could cause the government problems yet. We shall see.
 
The Telegraph

Assiduously protecting the interests of the well-off.

From another article . . ;)

Earned income taxed twice as heavily as capital gains for some in UK, study finds

A graduate earning £35,000 a year pays almost double the average tax of someone with the same income from rent on property, according to a study of inequality in the UK tax system.


The combined effect of income tax and national insurance payments forces people in employment to pay much higher rates of tax than those who benefit from lower capital gains tax (CGT) rates on property and shares income, according to the Intergenerational Foundation thinktank.

In a separate example that also emphasises the gap between the mainly older people who generate an income from property and shares and those who rely on employment, a person receiving £60,000 a year in the form of capital gains or dividends pays less tax than someone aged 16 to 64 in a job earning £35,000.

“Earned income, in such cases, is taxed two to four times more heavily than unearned income,” said the foundation, an independent charity that funds research into issues affecting young people.

Based on analysis of HMRC data, the foundation said increasing CGT rates to the same level as rates on earned income would raise at least £10bn extra a year, allowing the government to cut tax rates at each income tax threshold by at least 1.25 percentage points.

The momentum behind calls for the equalisation of capital and employment tax rates has grown in recent years. Recent polling has shown support across the political spectrum, with 61% overall saying they back reform.
Before it was scrapped, the Office of Tax Simplification said the tax system would be better designed if the rates for CGT and income tax were more closely aligned. It said putting CGT up to the level of income tax would raise £14bn.

The former Conservative chancellor Nigel Lawson set the rates of CGT at the same level as income tax in 1988, saying: “In principle, there is little economic difference between [earned] income and capital gains ... And in so far as there is a difference, it is by no means clear why one should be taxed more heavily than the other.”

Since Lawson’s time in office, capital gains have risen 16 times from below £5bn a year to an estimated £80bn in the financial year 2020-21, but the amount of tax raised from capital gains has only risen three times to about £15bn.

Higher rate taxpayers earning more than just over £50,000 a year pay 42% on every extra pound earned from employment, but pay only 20% on gains from shares and 28% from gains on property.

Standard rate taxpayers, which includes most taxpayers over the age of 65, only pay 18% on property gains, 10% on gains from shares and 20% on rental income.

The authors said the current system allowed for significant levels of avoidance by those with income from capital gains who were allowed to smooth the declaration of their income to make sure it fell under the tax threshold over a period of years.

“The wealthy obtain two main advantages from the current system not available to most of the population: first, a large lump of tax-exempt capital gains; secondly, a maximum tax of 20%, which is less than half the top rate of income tax,” the report said.

“Those who can manipulate the tax system in their favour tend to be those with high incomes or high levels of wealth, leaving a larger tax burden on younger people and those on lower incomes, further perpetuating inequalities between and within generations,” it added.

The tax privileges granted to those with unearned income in the UK are also over- generous by European standards, the report said. “For example, in Germany the annual exempt allowance is only €1,000 and all capital gains are taxed at 26.4%, while in France unearned income is taxed at 30-34%.”
Thanks for posting that. I feel harder done by now than I did before though.
 
Back
Top