Hornet 6
Well-Known Member
Why not. If the man and machine can do the job at 400 yards
Not my point at all, my point is this was supposed to be a stalking rifle, a 400 yard shot is not stalking its long range sniping at live animals.
Neil.
Why not. If the man and machine can do the job at 400 yards
Until that lovely wood swells after several days on the hill not to mention scratched and dented? Been there done that and plastic all day for me on the hill.To be honest I am surprised you have to ask this question. (you must be bored).
It is very easy. Rigby 275 with a 6 X 42 leupold. Really cant see why a lump of plastic can compere.
Tusker
Cut my teeth on a Parker Hale 270 great rifle never needed a tin can on the hill myself but then I'm only ever a paying guest. Bonny picture. The stock looking like it could do with a good oiling. Must have been the wet?This stag was taken at 150 yrds with this Parker Hale Safari 1200 in 270 win. both me and rifle were soaked for two days in constant rain. i had to wade a river in spate to get into him.
Tusker
You'll be learning German nextThis thread is only adding to an already stuborn itch that is procuring a deer-legal stutzen for woodland stalking.
K
The op wants a rifle he can stalk with and thats accurate enough to 400 yards. Its up to the person who is going to shoot to decide if he can achieve a humane kill. My point is a clean kill a 10 yards or 400 is a clean kill. I was asked by a landowner to shoot deer a couple of years ago. I said to whats happened to the fella who used to do it. He replied , i seen him crawling about in the mud, trying to get close as he could to a doe, well it ran away and the fella says awk its there for another day. The landowner said i dont want them there for another day, i just want them dead. I control deer for a living, i am not employed to play at stalking. If that is what you want to do thats good. What defines a stalking rifle i used to control deer with a sendero, not many people would call it a stalking rifleNot my point at all, my point is this was supposed to be a stalking rifle, a 400 yard shot is not stalking its long range sniping at live animals.
Neil.
T3 lite..OK hear me out.
Its reliable, its light, there is no shortage of spare bits and bobs. Its been used by many including the the FC who shoot thousands of deer per year. It can withstand all sorts of abuse, all sort of weathers and still shoots well. Accurate.
Sorry we have moved on since that Rigby. Even Paul Mauser would have chosen the carbon stock over the wooden one if they would have had the chance. Paul was an engineer and would have understood the benefits. Let's face it, wood fitted to a rifle is a dead, rejected by nature material that is slowly decaying... dead wood has no purpose in nature except rotting/creating humus... fact. It was never designed to be a rifle stock and does not even have the right fibre orientation. Wood was used because nothing better was available... fact. Yes wood looks nice but has too many disadvantages compared to modern possibilities. Ever asked why they don't build aeroplanes of wood anymore? I have a few wooden stocked shotguns and the odd rifle but if you want something really reliable wood is not the way. Even the military noticed latest while Vietnam that wood is not the way to go if you need reliability.
edi
I think we will all be decayed before my rifle stockwood fitted to a rifle is a dead, rejected by nature material that is slowly decaying...
https://cdn1.sako.fi/sites/default/files/85_finnlight_0.png
. The perfect hill rifle.
na...perfect factory lightweight stalking rifle, can only be brno 21h in bolt action and merkel O/U 201e in a double. 7x57(r) of course
TUT TUT TUT Kev, Throw & wait!,I bought a t3 243 off here sent it to brock and Norris. It is now a lightweight 308 stalking rifle
Oriis 20" fluted sporter barrel t3x super varmint stock Shultz Larsen tmd 35 mod and zeiss scope .now want the same in 6.5x55 . But new dog forces me to wait
