.308 bloke
Well-Known Member
It's not a contentious issue for 99% of people in the UK. An 'ethical' shot here is considered a shot you can definately make, with pretty much no risk of missing.I hunt using both above methods , though I understand how some feel about either extreme . One old friend of mine uses a Shiloh Sharps to take game in Black Timber ( which covers a large part of the province ) every year . He is probably the best woodland stalker I know , his skill set is perfectly matched to his environment and the game he hunts . Another friend , Perry , who was pictured here holding a 200 lb Cougar Tom a while back , regularly shoots on his property out to roughly 700 yards . He also takes game out to about 500 , that's what he enjoys and he's very good at it . Both of them are far better than I am at their chosen method , I have a high amount of respect for both . They're just different ways to accomplish the same thing , I'm a little confused as to why this is a contentious issue actually . When it comes to hunting , do whatever blows your hair back and I'm all for it .
AB
Tbh, I've just been enjoying teasing people who believe that unless you creep right up to an animal that doesn't even realise you're there, you're some sort of cad, or that the effective range of a 243 or 308 is no more than 150 yards.

one hopes?
