not the 6.5x55 ? or maybe the 6mm Remington ? fancy that , people have chosen a modern more accurate design of cartridge , well I never !
are you getting my point about your original post I commented on yet ? (I doubt it !) and if you did your highly unlikely to concede that I or anyone else has a point having dealt with you before on line.
good day
Blimey, you really did fall out of bed the wrong side this morning! either that or you forgot to take your meds...
It was a genuine question... what records have been broken by the Creedmore? You talk about evidence and facts but have presented none! ANNNDDDD you have completely misunderstood my original post!
My point is quite simple... on paper, there is a POSSIBILITY, that the creedmore could perform better than the swede, the swede isn't typically a go to choice for 1k shooting, that tends to be
mainly 6mm in the benchrest world and
mainly 308 in the F/tr world. But, the
potential gains of a creedmore over a swede (if any) will be completely negated by the human element! The main reason new, boutique cartridges such as this gain traction comes down to fashion and really not much else.. so, why handicap yourself and spend a small fortune on a rifle you will ultimately find it difficult and/or expensive to feed... the Swede is as good, or within a degree where human error will make it as good, is easy to obtain, both made up and in components and is so long in the tooth, and popular in Europe, the chances of ammo and components vanishing from the shelves is very low.... can the same be said for the Creedmore?
You are bringing in cross calibre arguments, I was referring to same calibre, different chamberings (apples with apples)... Using your argument why don't we start talking about 338LM or 375 cheytacs? the argument doesn't stand!