howa243
Well-Known Member
Whilst I would agree that the miss rate would probably be lower you cannot know about the wounding rate. My interpretation of the data was that the recovery rate of wounded animals was very high and didn't need the services of a tracking dog in most cases.
But again! the people that go bow hunting enjoy bow hunting. If they had cull targets to reach and were only interested in numbers I doubt that many would use a bow and would use a rifle instead. maybe it is worth noting that the total number of Roe taken in Denmark over the 2016/2017 hunting season was over 106,000. So it is quite a small percentage of the total.
Thats fine then.

