S&B P4FL reticle FFP

[JabaliHunter]

Any feedback on this reticle for stalking use (as opposed to target use) in a FFP PM2 scope?

 

[Rory]

I use a non illuminated P3 reticle and I really like it. The P4L Fein is thinner, but I can appreciate how much the illuminated reticle will assist you.
Average chest depth of a Roe = 25cm. 2.5mils chest depth in your scope ~100m.
With FFP you can really make use of the range estimation properties of the mil scale.

 

[Ronin]

I’ve used P4f ret on a number of PM11 scoped for the last 15? Years possibly longer For stalking, culling and Target

The ret is about perfect

The only better one in my view is the MSR2

I wound not hesitate to use P4f

 

[ejg]

I have been shooting the P4FL since a few years in a 3-20 x50 Ultra short PMII. Have no issues with it but as Ronin say's the MRS2 is better. I just love a small dot in the middle, maybe easier to focus on the dot being in the right spot.

edi

 

[Cumbrian 1]

I have 4 rifles with pm2s all FFP with the P4FL it’s pretty close to perfection.

 

[User00040]

Have both P3 and P4FL reticles in S&B scopes, hard to find a better choice but be aware that illumination on PM2's is geared towards NV or low light use. If you need retina burning dot brightness get a flashdot scope.

 

[North Stalker]

As I like the fine reticles, I had this on a PM2. If I was to buy a S&B again, it would have this reticle. The illumination is helpful, I used the scope in day time and night time foxing and lamping with no issues.
Would I have again, Yes,but only if Swarovski stopped producing the 4ai

 

[parabellum]

Just be sure the reticle markings match the turret readings...fundamental IMO

 

[Kjm041]

Just be sure the reticle markings match the turret readings...fundamental IMO

Do Schmidt fall foul of that?

 

[parabellum]

Yes . Had a 12-50X56 P4F drove me nuts.