looks like there is no undercut between the thread and the shoulder (see pic below), that would stop the mod engaging the shoulder (unless the mod had a recess to accomodate the non threaded area )Thanks for the replies.
just to add more details.
Its a factory remington 700 barrel.
The threaded bridge is what comes with these aim sport mod's so you can swap them between rifles.
I don't believe the thread length to be too long as when the mod is remove and looking into it their is a long way in till it could contact anything.
i have shot a few hundred rounds through this set up with no issues but possibly i haven't had issues because im shooting a 6.5mm through a 7.7mm mod.
Hear is some more photos with the mod off looks like the threading hasn't been finished (note im a sparky so have not machining knowledge)
thats all well and good, but if general practise is to undercut the thread and moderator manufacturers build to that, then you are going to get this problem.In my apprenticeship we learned to bore out the female threaded part to outside thread diameter 1 or two threads (overcut?). Stronger solution than undercutting the male threaded part. That is why some mil barrels do not have the undercut I presume. Hausken mods I have fit on my CTR barrels that have no undercut.
edi
That is what you think, as I said in my apprenticeship in 1980 it was already general practice to choose the stronger option in situations where it is of advantage. Yes we also used undercut but we learned and calculated that it would weaken the connection substantially. Why choose the worse solution if a good solution is so easy?thats all well and good, but if general practise is to undercut the thread and moderator manufacturers build to that, then you are going to get this problem.
It's not what I think it's common industry practise, they will have calculated the stresses involved and decided that this is the best way forward, or have you heard of multiple barrel separations at the muzzle thread ?That is what you think, as I said in my apprenticeship in 1980 it was already general practice to choose the stronger option in situations where it is of advantage. Yes we also used undercut but we learned and calculated that it would weaken the connection substantially. Why choose the worse solution if a good solution is so easy?
edi
Mostly to be sure it works the relief cut is done X deeper than the root, there probably is a DIN standard for that. Anyway it is exactly where the connection has the weakest point. Meaning one weakens even further. Every one can do the maths themselves, take an extreme example such as M14 and 308 bore which is standard on hunting rifles. Stick a long mod on the front... trip and fall on the rifle. Calculate the stress.If the tgread relief is machined to root depth of thread (what I do) there is no loss of strength or integrity
A relief also works on female thread