ADVICE FROM HAMPSHIRE POLICE

The first two lines of their statement are incorrect. The govenrment has not asked that only people in essential occupations go out to work.
With the number of breaches of the Firearms Act 1968 that HADs can be exposed to in a normal set of events it is crucial that we know how we stand at all times especially now IMHO
 
Would not hesitate to carry out HD in these (or any) circumstances. It would be a terrible thing otherwise.
Ok, just to play devil's advocate -
Would it be more terrible than going out for HAD, getting Covid-19 from someone who happened to also be at the scene, getting admitted to hospital, and tying up a bed that could otherwise have been used for someone who contracted Covid-19 in a care home because they couldn't physically practice social-distancing? I'll leave that for the philosophers to answer...

Like I said, just paying devil's advocate. I'm just as ****ed off at not being able to get out stalking - and trout season has been open for 15 days now too :(
 
I have been tasked twice in the last fortnight by Hampshire under our HAD Scheme therefore it is a reasonable assumption that HD is deemed as an essential activity so not an issue to those duly tasked,
Interesting, I haven't been called out for months. Starting to think they had removed me.
 
Ok, just to play devil's advocate -
Would it be more terrible than going out for HAD, getting Covid-19 from someone who happened to also be at the scene, getting admitted to hospital, and tying up a bed that could otherwise have been used for someone who contracted Covid-19 in a care home because they couldn't physically practice social-distancing? I'll leave that for the philosophers to answer...

Like I said, just paying devil's advocate. I'm just as ****ed off at not being able to get out stalking - and trout season has been open for 15 days now too :(
Playing the devil's other advocate:
1. Just how the hell is anyone supposed to be able to catch Covid out stalking?
2. Pretty much all forms of shooting live quarry at this time of year are necessarily essential - otherwise it wouldn't comply with General Licences. People may come to regret deciding that the protection of crops, forestry or the environment are non-essential when some turd like Packham turns round next year and starts a legal challenge against all shooting on the basis that lots of shooters all agreed that it wasn't necessary to shoot animals.
3. The argument that shooting now is a burden on emergency services is nonsense. Shooting and stalking are very safe activities with a low accident rate. You're much more likely to have an accident or event requiring an ambulance at home.

Having had Covid in the family, i absolutely agree that we shpuld all do whatever we can to stop it spreading, but to avoid activities that pose no plausible risk whatsoever achieves nothing except to shorten the length of time for which a national lockdown is sustainable.
 
Playing the devil's other advocate:
1. Just how the hell is anyone supposed to be able to catch Covid out stalking?
2. Pretty much all forms of shooting live quarry at this time of year are necessarily essential - otherwise it wouldn't comply with General Licences. People may come to regret deciding that the protection of crops, forestry or the environment are non-essential when some turd like Packham turns round next year and starts a legal challenge against all shooting on the basis that lots of shooters all agreed that it wasn't necessary to shoot animals.
3. The argument that shooting now is a burden on emergency services is nonsense. Shooting and stalking are very safe activities with a low accident rate. You're much more likely to have an accident or event requiring an ambulance at home.

Having had Covid in the family, i absolutely agree that we shpuld all do whatever we can to stop it spreading, but to avoid activities that pose no plausible risk whatsoever achieves nothing except to shorten the length of time for which a national lockdown is sustainable.
All very true and logical but it’s the driving to and from the shooting ground they don’t like, unless you do so on a bike or a horse.
3000 odd fines been issued now for non essential time out of lockdown.
 
Playing the devil's other advocate:
1. Just how the hell is anyone supposed to be able to catch Covid out stalking?
2. Pretty much all forms of shooting live quarry at this time of year are necessarily essential - otherwise it wouldn't comply with General Licences. People may come to regret deciding that the protection of crops, forestry or the environment are non-essential when some turd like Packham turns round next year and starts a legal challenge against all shooting on the basis that lots of shooters all agreed that it wasn't necessary to shoot animals.
3. The argument that shooting now is a burden on emergency services is nonsense. Shooting and stalking are very safe activities with a low accident rate. You're much more likely to have an accident or event requiring an ambulance at home.

Having had Covid in the family, i absolutely agree that we shpuld all do whatever we can to stop it spreading, but to avoid activities that pose no plausible risk whatsoever achieves nothing except to shorten the length of time for which a national lockdown is sustainable.
[/QUOTE. I understand where you are coming from totally, but I think the vital thing to bear in mind, is that saving lives is FAR more important than shooting any animals, irrespective of any misdemeanours commited by them, whatever turds like Packham say or do, simples.
 
I’m not against this in anyway but why can people still ride horses and go cycling, as I’m pretty sure there is a much higher accident rate and risk associated with these hobbies. Not starting an argument just a thought.

I agree. Cycling is perhaps not such a risk, but horses are pretty unpredictable at the best of times. My wife and I have decided that our horses will go unridden for the duration. Our view is that if we were to have a bad fall, it would be completely irresponsible to expect an already overstretched NHS to respond to a totally avoidable accident. Yes, we miss it dreadfully. But we all need to be as responsible as possible, and just making sure you're not taking unnecessary risks goes a long way.
 
I agree. Cycling is perhaps not such a risk, but horses are pretty unpredictable at the best of times. My wife and I have decided that our horses will go unridden for the duration. Our view is that if we were to have a bad fall, it would be completely irresponsible to expect an already overstretched NHS to respond to a totally avoidable accident.

My wife decided to stop riding a long time ago :rofl:
 
@Hornet : I am extremely aware of the imperative to save lives. However, going shooting or stalking has zero effect on public safety for two reasons: A) it presents no scientifically plausible risk whatsoever of either spreading or acquiring covid and B) does not in any way increase the risk of requiring emergency services.
For those reasons, quoting an imperative to save lives as a reason not to go shooting is as relevant as stating that we should all paint ourselves violet to protect ourselves from covid. It's mumbo jumbo.
All very true and logical but it’s the driving to and from the shooting ground they don’t like, unless you do so on a bike or a horse.
3000 odd fines been issued now for non essential time out of lockdown.
They may not like it, but it's not illegal. Some of the fines and arrests that have been made were clearly lunatic and in some cases have been overturned by courts. Given that a reasonable case exists for stalking or shooting being "essential", then the police have no excuse for issuing fines, and certainly no excuse for making dodgy threats about revoking certificates. It doesn't matter at all how you get there.
 
Just for clarity I'm not connected with firearms dept., I was sent it by a friend and thought it worth sharing.
 
Playing the devil's other advocate:
1. Just how the hell is anyone supposed to be able to catch Covid out stalking?
2. Pretty much all forms of shooting live quarry at this time of year are necessarily essential - otherwise it wouldn't comply with General Licences. People may come to regret deciding that the protection of crops, forestry or the environment are non-essential when some turd like Packham turns round next year and starts a legal challenge against all shooting on the basis that lots of shooters all agreed that it wasn't necessary to shoot animals.
3. The argument that shooting now is a burden on emergency services is nonsense. Shooting and stalking are very safe activities with a low accident rate. You're much more likely to have an accident or event requiring an ambulance at home.

Having had Covid in the family, i absolutely agree that we shpuld all do whatever we can to stop it spreading, but to avoid activities that pose no plausible risk whatsoever achieves nothing except to shorten the length of time for which a national lockdown is sustainable.

I hope your family member(s) are recovering well. An old friend in the village, a fit and healthy 70 year old, and a superb carpenter sadly died yesterday.

In support of your other points...

1. Indeed, and perhaps more importantly how will you infect anybody else?
2. I have just responded to an email from the GloucesterPolice HAD coordinator asking after my circumstances re. self-isolation and whether I would be happy to be called out...my response was:-
"Yes, happy to be called out. I see no difficulty in maintaining social distance from the officers at the scene. “Happy" not quite the right word given the circumstances…willing? :)"
3. Regarding the extra burden on the NHS if one has an accident away from home...according to RoSPA:-

"More accidents happen at home than anywhere else"


Regarding the OP misinformation which is widespread on here...people have heard "only go to work if essential" and have apparently overlooked the bit about, essential because you can't take your 4 tonne lathe home to work on...and then declare incorrectly that it is only essential [front-line] work that may be continued...

“During this time of unprecedented disruption, the UK Government is not asking all businesses to shut – indeed it is important for business to carry on. Only some non-essential shops and public venues have been asked to close.”


Alan
 
Last edited:
2. Pretty much all forms of shooting live quarry at this time of year are necessarily essential - otherwise it wouldn't comply with General Licences.
I have some sympathy with this argument and again the Police statement, while heart-felt and intended to be helpful, is in fact no less ambiguous as all others IMHO:
"With regards pest and vermin control and deer management by firearm or shotgun certificate holders, this activity should only continue if it is essential in preventing such things as crop damage or harm to livestock."

And remember a wood/forest is a crop as is a small Estate' s vegetable & herb garden.

K
 
What's the point in shooting anything if you cannot dispose of it?

Forgive me if I have misunderstood you.
In the case of any animal (any animal) suffering and in need of dispatch (nonsense word meaning killing) disposal is a matter of complete indifference to me.
The only thing that matters to me is the alleviation of suffering and absolutely nothing should stand in the way of that.
 
Back
Top