Deermanagement
Well-Known Member
A colleague wants me to include a launch site on the plans I have for fully covered thetford style high seats. Been on the cards as a project for a couple of years 
Not sure about stalking, but I get some stunning shots with mine.
Depends on the size of your drone. This one is fine and has the least restrictions. Well worth reading up on though before investingLaw down here is you can't use drones over parks, beaches or sporting grounds. Basically any public land. How's the laws over there?
Not sure about stalking, but I get some stunning shots with mine.
It sure is!I can't help but think I have been there... Is it Morecambe Bay?
Lovely part of the world. I had a holiday up there a few years back.It sure is!
The clock should freeze at the point where the technology gives the hunter an unfair advantage over the prey, so it’ll vary from person to person.Ok, drones in general are not for me and I wouldn’t choose them to aid my stalking (I don’t feel the need) but.......
For all those that are saying it provides an unfair advantage, where do they feel it appropriate to freeze the clock of technical progression?
Do we outlaw telescopic sights, binoculars, thermal spotters, nitro cellulose powder, metallic cartridge ammunition?
we could soon be back to using flintlock muzzle loading rifles....
or we could go back further to spears arrows etc (no compound bows allowed lol)
Not sure if I’m getting my point across but I’m just asking, who has the right to freeze the March of technological progress if they are benefiting from relatively recent innovation themselves
Unfair advantage? How does one decide what that is exactly?The clock should freeze at the point where the technology gives the hunter an unfair advantage over the prey, so it’ll vary from person to person.
For me that’s drones and maybe thermal for sport stalking, for culling and control no limits.
Aye, I dont see many deer with the gear that we have so it's not fair at all from the deer's perspective.Unfair advantage? How does one decide what that is exactly?
+1. A sad reflection on modern societyNot on my watch you wouldnt.
If you can be bothered to walk the ground and get to know where your deer are and the terrain you will never make a stalker. I had a client ask me once if he could bring his drone on a booked stalk. Sure, no problem I replied, and I will bring my shotgun, to blow it out of the sky.
Drones might have their place, but not for stalking and finding deer.
Christ we’re a long way past that.The clock should freeze at the point where the technology gives the hunter an unfair advantage over the prey, so it’ll vary from person to person.
For me that’s drones and maybe thermal for sport stalking, for culling and control no limits.
Unfair advantage? How does one decide what that is exactly?
What a fantastic thing!Update from Germany: fawn-spotting with IR-drones.
I refer to my earlier post #139 and a German article published this weekend. Germany’s Federal Minister of Food and Agriculture has announced subsidies worth EUR 3 million to support nationwide fawn-spotting with IR drones. Studies have shown that this technology is the most efficient and effective method to discover fawns ahead of the first cut (harvest) of meadows, to both give them a chance of survival through relocation and to prevent contamination of silage (botulism).
Over recent years, private initiatives have sprung up all over the country, but are not available in every administrative district yet, primarily due to the prohibitive cost: effective kit costs EUR 7000 or more! Local, district hunting clubs and “fawn-saving” societies can apply for support of a maximum of two drones, with the subsidy capped at 60% of the cost, with a maximum of EUR 4000 per drone. The programme starts immediately and I hope that the word gets around quickly to ensure that many more drones will be flying this May.