Look I know this is going to cause a bit of an argument on here but here goes.
So over the last couple of months I have been speaking to quite a few Outfitters like myself, mainly because expanding business and clientele contacts is an ongoing process and usually many of us work together in different aspects of our sport due the different species of deer etc we may have available. Time and time again the conversation comes up over whether British stalkers are worth dealing with.
It is true that shooters in the UK demand more for less, the idea of many shooters in the UK is that stalking should be free and in that case the jobs that Outfitters do are not real jobs.
The conversation over price always comes up and stokes massive debate but frankly it does not matter what the price is there will always be complaints.
I have spoke to many Outfitters now who just refuse to deal with the UK shooting community, "it's just not worth the hassle" is what many of them say. I myself predominantly have British clients but even then on occasion I question why I bother.
It's a hard enough time for shooters in the UK but in many cases British shooters are their own worst enemies.
I have often heard of, and this has happened to me also, UK stalkers who have went out and failed to pull the trigger then go on social media afterwards and blast that Outfitter for them failing to provide a deer, you just don't get that from the EU or the American hunters. Many of our peers in our sport have forgotten what hunting is all about, truly they have and are very keen on turning to places like this forum and social media to have a go. I don't think they realise how much harm they are doing to their own sport.
I have message after message of endorsements saved in my phone from my overseas clients, and many were booked to return last year but Covid caused them to cancel. Likewise I have some from my UK clients. I often find that those who pay less shout the loudest.
So is it any wonder why Outfitters just do not want to deal with the UK stalking community and often over price for that reason?
Look I get it, there is an argument that we should not let so called "rogue" outfitters get away with ripping people off but it is often the lowest priced outfitters that get the most grief and it's not always the case that you only get what you paid for as sometimes their service offers far more than those with the increased price. It's actually more down to the clientele that goes with them.
I have been told time and time again that my prices attract the wrong people because I charge too low.
Are those that say that right?
Does that mean, me offering what I think is a price that the average person can afford is actually doing more harm than good to the industry because of the people it attracts?
If that's the case then I will be taking a different tact in future as the prices I currently charge make me literally nothing more than my fuel costs with a bit on top.
If this is the model though of the future does that mean the attitudes of UK stalkers have actually priced themselves out of being able to stalk?
You are a fickle lot I have to say that.
More and more people are starting up stalking and shooting in general, more and more require land to shoot over and there is less and less opportunities available.
It's all something to think about
So over the last couple of months I have been speaking to quite a few Outfitters like myself, mainly because expanding business and clientele contacts is an ongoing process and usually many of us work together in different aspects of our sport due the different species of deer etc we may have available. Time and time again the conversation comes up over whether British stalkers are worth dealing with.
It is true that shooters in the UK demand more for less, the idea of many shooters in the UK is that stalking should be free and in that case the jobs that Outfitters do are not real jobs.
The conversation over price always comes up and stokes massive debate but frankly it does not matter what the price is there will always be complaints.
I have spoke to many Outfitters now who just refuse to deal with the UK shooting community, "it's just not worth the hassle" is what many of them say. I myself predominantly have British clients but even then on occasion I question why I bother.
It's a hard enough time for shooters in the UK but in many cases British shooters are their own worst enemies.
I have often heard of, and this has happened to me also, UK stalkers who have went out and failed to pull the trigger then go on social media afterwards and blast that Outfitter for them failing to provide a deer, you just don't get that from the EU or the American hunters. Many of our peers in our sport have forgotten what hunting is all about, truly they have and are very keen on turning to places like this forum and social media to have a go. I don't think they realise how much harm they are doing to their own sport.
I have message after message of endorsements saved in my phone from my overseas clients, and many were booked to return last year but Covid caused them to cancel. Likewise I have some from my UK clients. I often find that those who pay less shout the loudest.
So is it any wonder why Outfitters just do not want to deal with the UK stalking community and often over price for that reason?
Look I get it, there is an argument that we should not let so called "rogue" outfitters get away with ripping people off but it is often the lowest priced outfitters that get the most grief and it's not always the case that you only get what you paid for as sometimes their service offers far more than those with the increased price. It's actually more down to the clientele that goes with them.
I have been told time and time again that my prices attract the wrong people because I charge too low.
Are those that say that right?
Does that mean, me offering what I think is a price that the average person can afford is actually doing more harm than good to the industry because of the people it attracts?
If that's the case then I will be taking a different tact in future as the prices I currently charge make me literally nothing more than my fuel costs with a bit on top.
If this is the model though of the future does that mean the attitudes of UK stalkers have actually priced themselves out of being able to stalk?
You are a fickle lot I have to say that.
More and more people are starting up stalking and shooting in general, more and more require land to shoot over and there is less and less opportunities available.
It's all something to think about
Last edited: