Omicron

Here we go. Were we really infectious?



I think we all knew they were bogus when people living in close proximity were not testing positive yet other individuals were. It made no sense.

The scamdemic will eventually be given full disclosure and all those who claimed the moral high ground will be back tracking.
 
I think we all knew they were bogus when people living in close proximity were not testing positive yet other individuals were. It made no sense.

The scamdemic will eventually be given full disclosure and all those who claimed the moral high ground will be back tracking.
Or denying they ever supported lockdowns and social distancing... or pressurising people to have vaccinations

Some will say ‘we were only doing what was advised as best practice’. Unable to think for themselves, think critically, ponder actual evidence...

Too stupid to vote, or poisonous little Stasi-ites.
 
The scamdemic will eventually be given full disclosure and all those who claimed the moral high ground will be back tracking.
I seriously doubt that will ever happen.
However please remember that in every profession- it is possible to get things wrong, even more so when your opeing the instruction booklet on something you havent seen before.
 
Or denying they ever supported lockdowns and social distancing... or pressurising people to have vaccinations

Some will say ‘we were only doing what was advised as best practice’. Unable to think for themselves, think critically, ponder actual evidence...

Too stupid to vote, or poisonous little Stasi-ites.

It has been an important lesson for me. People ask how the Stazi was able to pay people to inform on their neighbours for years, whereas these days people just did it for free and were happy to contribute.

Also I have seen how fast people can be manipulated to "hate" someone like the Nazis. Whether its their right to their own choice or simply because they are of a certain eastern european ancestory you can be that villified that the government feels they can take your property, impose sanctions on people who had SFA to do with any decision and hate on an entire generation without any self reflection.

We are really just one step away from the pond soup that we think we've risen above.
 
Ha, I have just bought a PCR 2 day after arrival test kit for my German daughter as she will not take the booster jab, she arrives in the UK on 1st April now the UK gov has dropped all restrictions from 18th March "her April fools gift" but I paid, ouch.
 
One of the aforementioned ‘patterns’ some of us “see” in quite ‘random’ events (no pun intended)? It would be good to know the blood test results (as discussed in the previous post), if for no other reason than to give some comfort to the 2022 Australian Open ’winner’ and his family.

Rafael Nadal says he suffered from breathing difficulties during his straight sets 6-3, 7-6 (5) loss to Taylor Fritz at the Indian Wells final. Nadal, 35, appeared out of sorts and found himself 4-0 down before leaving the court for treatment.

He looked more comfortable on his return but struggled to break down a determined Fritz.

“It's tough for me to breathe. When I try to breathe, it's painful and it's very uncomfortable," said Nadal.

"When I'm breathing, when I'm moving it's like a needle all the time inside here. I get dizzy a little bit because it's painful. It's a kind of pain that limits me a lot. It's not only about pain, I don't feel very well because it affects my breathing."

Nadal had won his previous 20 matches in 2022, including the Australian Open title. But he made 34 unforced errors in the match compared to 22 from Fritz.

”Honestly I am sad because of the way I was not able to compete," he added. "The thing that worries me now, it's about what's going on there, what I have to do now to recover and how long it's going to take."

Source: Free Press Journal, India

Rafael Nadal says he suffered from breathing difficulties during his loss to Taylor Fritz in Indian Wells final
 
Some will say ‘we were only doing what was advised as best practice’.
Curiously, that is often what people who know something about the subject decide to do once they have had a chance to 'think for themselves, think critically, ponder actual evidence': that is how particular practices end up being recommended by the people in a position to make meaningful recommendations to those with less of an idea.
 
Seems that the evidence on the ground garnered by doctors working among real patients is somewhat at odds with the words of the journalists: who would have thought that? Why might that be? A $40million bung to Liverpool Uni in order to ‘keep the boat afloat’ for those with skin in the jab game, doesn’t seem to be bad value if it suppresse the information and evidence that highlights a safer alternative.

And where it’s leading all to:

 
Daughter a nursery nurse in Munich and her hubby my son in law both went down with it on Wednesday last, she was very rough for two days but now she seems to be on the mend
 
Back
Top