It’s for sure not about sustainability or management of deer - they are viewed as ‘the problem’ in the piece - albeit a problem in a habitat of the land managers’ own making - it’s about maximising pressure on them with a view to eradication/minimising numbers on the area in the bid to help make the scrub there grow. Eventually conditions will be suitable over large tracts of Scotland in order for the lynx and possibly the wolf to be reintroduced, this is the longer term objective, though not everyone recognises or necessarily agrees with the idea.
10,000 acres on any sporting hill estate would not amount to more than 2 stalking beats, but of course it was different there in Beaton the elder’s days. Objectives have changed, and it is a type of ‘progress‘, where the human condition, that of the deer, and sustainable management of the resource and related local community activity, infrastructure and cohesion play second fiddle to the principal objective of now; times have changed for sure. Naturescot are probably looking to make use of extra boots on the ground to reduce numbers and maintain pressure on those deer remaining in the most cost-effective manner. Funny how this approach isn’t that of other public agencies still splurging large sums of taxpayers money on deer control - as yet - as on paper there are relatively few downsides, unless you happen to be the deer.
It reminds me too a little of a similar sized but low ground estate which had 24 Rifles permitted to be on the ground, also run by an agency supremo. That one didn’t end well, but this time it’ll doubtless be different. Many will doubtless watch on at this site with interest too.
Is it stalking though?