Yep well said , fully agree ! Problem is many of those professions do not disclose such things freely , there are even serious consequences at play . I never thought the shooting orgs etc might fuel the fire but i honestly think there might be a valid point there , a bit "British Leyland " I dare say " if we made our cars better people would not buy another so soon "Normalisation.
This is something I think we've got to work at.
The more furtive we are, the more the public will mistrust us. People associate guns with bad things, because that's all that hits the headlines. They don't realise that perhaps their doctor, their dentist, their kids' school teachers, the bloke who empties their bins, just normal everyday folk they know, like and trust, are also shooters. If they did, I think we'd have a lot less bother. So, the normalisation of firearms ownership and use is essential, imo, if there's to be any future for shooting sports in this country.
The shooting orgs could really do something here, but at present I think that they're part of the problem, fueling the "us and them" mentality.
At the same time we point the finger at the likes of Packham for the exact thing our orgs might well be doing themselves ? Dunno but i do see the logic




