Best All in 1 Scope : March Compact 2.5-25x52 ?

Overthehill

Well-Known Member
I'm no expert so looking for advice.... Could the March Compact 2.5-25x52 be the best All in 1 Scope? It seems to have everything albeit pricey but no more so than the "other" top tier scopes...FOV 1.4-14m, 10yr warranty, tactical turrets, zero stop, elevation 34mrad and windage 17mrad, red illuminated reticle, good eye relief, 30mm tube, weight 665g, parallax adjustable, shock/water/fog... Advice and real life experience of the scope or possible alternatives appreciated.i know lads will say Swarovski, S&B, Kahles, Zeiss etc are the Pinnacle....yes they are great & have the usual features but do any offer such a good field of view plus great elevation/windage (allowing for short and long range shooting) on a light weight 30mm tube? Or am I missing something? I'm assuming the glass on the March is good. Is the eye box good..ie. easy to get behind? Thanks in advance..
 
Great scope. Though I like the 42mm better for its more harmonic appearance. But the 52mm has better light gathering and a bit more forgiving exit pupil. This is indeed a little finicky for unexperienced users. No wonder given the max. mag.
I don't like tactical turrets for stalking. But that's just me. Plus there are capped turret versions available.
I only had the non-illuminated models, so I'm not sure what the ill. rets look like. But if I remember correctly the whole reticle is lit. Not ideal for stalking.
Otherwise, weight, dimensions and performance are unrivalled in this combination.
 
For stalking I'd prefer the 1.5-15x42.
The FD-1 and FD-2 reticles have the centre dot illumination only and it's got a fast focus eye piece.
The only caveat is that it's extremely short which could present mounting problems in some cases.
 
Amazing scopes, with a price to match.

If you don’t need the extreme magnification range, there are simpler options that outperform it in low light for less money, but I don’t think there’s anything that rivals its features while still having reasonable size and weight.
 
I totally agree with you regarding a whole lit reticle but this scope does come in the FD-1 il version, so ideal for stalking. I suppose the point is, along with all the other usual required features, this scope's magnification range allows for an ultra short range out to a medium range stalk but also long range target shooting.... For me, if I was to ever buy a top tier priced scope, it would be a once off never, to be repeated purchase and as such I'd like it to do as much as possible, as well as possible. I did read the parallax adjustment (image refinement) can be a bit finicky the higher the mag as you say. Is this a deal breaker or something to worry about?
 
Also it would primarily be used for stalking...are tactical turrets a serious issue in this regard...?
How far do you shoot?

Regardless, this issue is going to kick off the usual discussion on holdover vs. dialong.
I'm in the holdover camp. 😁
 
Last edited:
I was looking at a Zeiss V6 Conquest but found it very hard to get behind.... What's the March like in this regard?
 
I'm only at this a short while, have shot out to 240-250 with decent success but long range target shooting using turret dialling appeals and as I say... This will be a once off purchase so getting it right and covering all angles is important... If I never do any long range, the extra mag in this case won't hurt, right?
 
I was looking at a Zeiss V6 Conquest but found it very hard to get behind.... What's the March like in this regard?
Don't know which V6 you're talking about. I had the 3-18x50. This was sugar against the March. Like I said, you need to be experienced to use the March.
 
parallax adjustment (image refinement) can be a bit finicky the higher the mag
A scope's depth of field (and therefore the finickiness of its parallax adjustment) is determined by distance, magnification and aperture, so every scope of a given objective diameter will have the same DoF at the same magnification and range.

Larger apertures, higher magnifications and shorter distances make the DoF shallower.

It's possible to reduce the aperture by putting on a lens cover with a hole in the centre, which gets more of the foreground and background in focus at the same time. This comes at the expense of a smaller exit pupil, which is dimmer and more sensitive to eye placement, so very few people bother with it.
 
Yees, it does. The higher the mag range the more the manufactures have to limit the exit pupil, also on low mag settings.
It's more the laws of physics applicable to optical design which limit the size of the exit pupil. :D
 
It's more the laws of physics that apply to optical design which limit the size of the exit pupil. :D
Not only. Look at some of the specs re. exit pupil of some the 8x mag range scopes and do the math. You will find that the exit pupil on low mag is smaller than would be physically possible.
 
Also it would primarily be used for stalking...are tactical turrets a serious issue in this regard...?
If it is to be used primarily as a stalking scope, I personally would look elsewhere.

I have a March compact and also Delta Titanium HDs and also S&B Polar T96 amongst owning and using a variety of other scopes over the years. Scope addiction is a bit of an illness for me.

March make brilliant scopes and I love mine but it is not a stalking scope. Certainly it is a really good option if you are doing lots of medium or longer range stuff with a requirement to also shoot some deer but if it is the other way round, I think you can buy something else.

With a x 10 zoom like a 2.5-25 range does require compromises in how it functions and mostly with the compact range, it is a fussy eyebox over say x16mag that you really see it. No issue whatsoever behind a bipod when prone but it needs consideration. Fussy focus is not something I personally see much with mine. I have used better and used worst but it is not something I find an issue with. Mine is used mostly to shoot small targets in terms of pests out to 400 odd yds or so. At that it excels better than any other scope I have used as it is small in both weight and dimensions, so keeps my little pest control light which is desirable as I walk up many hills with it. The 4 stage button illumination is better than the twist knobs you find on most scopes and the MTR3 reticle is, for me, the best compromise for visibility against dark backgrounds whilst not preventing very small aiming at distant targets. I visited March to view a few before buying and the MTR3 was the stand out choice for my needs.

A small mention should be given to their low profile but very well made and lightweight lens caps. They just work perfectly and can be used quietly.

I can shoot Muntjac at 15yds offhand on x2.5 mag in woodland and also shoot a squirrel on x22 mag at 400yds via the efficient and accurate turrets. The SFP scopes also subtend correctly at both x 10 and x 20 mag, albeit at different ratios but when you know what you are doing, that is grand for wind calls.

Last light wise, it will not live with a Zeiss HT or Polar T96 but then not much will in terms of lightish weight.

You might find that something like a second hand Zeiss Diavari 4-16x56 might suit your needs better. Or a Hendsolt alternative. They are very good options for a Stalking scope that can stand up to informal stuff at further range. By no means a target scope though but it doesn't sound like you need that.
 
Very interesting...😉👍
TBH I get the feeling that you would be better served by a 2-12x50. They are commonly available from a number of manufactures and you can sabe a lot of money vs. the March.
Plinking out to 300m and more is very well possible and enjoyable also with max. 12x.
 
Back
Top