Well that would be a big mistake ! Wet peat moor is the waaaay better solution to carbon , planting pines dries the moor out increases fires and severity of the fires as the peat dries out . I do live in such an area and the biggest issue here is UU plainly asked the question because they want to fill the wet peat moors with wind turbines for the cash not keep wet peat moor for its carbon capture and storage !
Headlines today all about hen harriers it seems , comming at us from all angles - EVEN THOUGH here in Bowland we have very good numbers but only on wet open peat moor preferably ones that aint full of wind turbines - that kill lots of birds all over the globe , yet not here ? Rubbish smoke and mirrors for UU to get what it really wants ( MORE MONEY FOR ITS INVESTERS AND STUFF THE NATURE THAT WE SHOOTERS CREATE THE VERY BEST HOME FOR THE HARRIER , CERLEW etc etc )
Hidden agenda is UU are working for share holders , whilst we are working with nature !
Totally agree
Using the hen harrier and raptor angle as diversionary tactics