Should that apply to the human race also?But the laws of nature dictate that the strongest and most adaptable survive, what if that’s the Corvids? We might not like it but who are we to impose our will?
Should that apply to the human race also?But the laws of nature dictate that the strongest and most adaptable survive, what if that’s the Corvids? We might not like it but who are we to impose our will?
Yes absolutely. But in such a complicated web there will always be contradictions.Your two comments above rather contradict each other, don't you think?
It obviously already hasShould that apply to the human race also?
I grew up in the Angus area of Scotland and never saw a magpie until about 10yrs ago.Maybe there are more magpies because humans killed a lot of the other birds of prey?!
As uncomfortable as it might be to some, nature will restore a balance if left alone. That balance might not be what we would like and some species would die out. 98% of species that have ever lived on earth are extinct.
I agree with reducing or removing invasive species where practical as that is another example of humans interfering with a ecosystem that is far too complex for us to understand.
I’m on this forum because I want to ethically reduce the number of deer to a population that is sustainable with the wider ecosystem. If i can feed my family and friends with the byproducts then that is a bonus. Im sorry to say it but if humans hadn’t killed off every apex predator and learned to live along side them, then the deer numbers would have been kept in better check.
I see the fear mongers come out every time wolves are mentioned, I have spend months in the wilderness in multiple countries with large wolf populations and have never been concerned or even heard of people having a dangerous encounter. I have seen several wolves in the wild and each time, they give a long stare and then run off.
I would question what the real motive for people who feel the need to shoot anything that preys on something else.
I know this will fall 99% fall on deaf ears, but hearing an alternate perspective is not a bad thing and forums like this can easily become echo chambers of a single view.
Just my thoughts![]()
Rubbish! We are being over-run by people who cannot/will not support themselves.It obviously already has
Our adaptability is one of the main reasons that we have been able to (over)populate and dominate in all climatic conditions.Rubbish!
IE work the system. Nothing to do with fitness! The welfare benefit system that socialist policies have been forced on us by do-gooders is contrary to your 'survival of the fittest' mantra.We might not be as fast/strong/big/venomous/poisonous/armoured as many animals but we have far greater cognitive abilities which has allowed us to think our way to the top.
Well, going off topic slightly, but…IE work the system. Nothing to do with fitness! The welfare benefit system that socialist policies have been forced on us by do-gooders is contrary to your 'survival of the fittest' mantra.
So you’re not in favour of letting nature sort that one out too?I’m on this forum because I want to ethically reduce the number of deer to a population that is sustainable with the wider ecosystem.
'Playing God'!! like our Welfare State encouraging breeding among people who cannot work/won't work.The sooner we leave nature to do what it has been doing for very much longer then our species has been playing god, the better.
Dreamer!If the aim of our species is to breed and spread to ensure our survival then surely looking after the less fortunate members will increase that![]()
There is a reasonably logical opinion that the rise in carrion is due to the increase in roadkill due to the increase in cars n the road!Maybe there are more magpies because humans killed a lot of the other birds of prey?!
I actually agree with some of what you've said. But we've already messed up the balance. Surely we have a responsibility to try and readdress that? It's not just about controlling some species, it includes farming & mindset change at government level. Personally I carry out predator control & on my small patch it's making a difference. I think it'd be a travesty if my kids couldn't hear skylarks when they're older or watch covey of grey partridge explode up and over the hedge. By the time nature found her level again, we'd have lost those birds for good. Shame on any countryman happily condoning practice that leads to that outcome.Maybe there are more magpies because humans killed a lot of the other birds of prey?!
As uncomfortable as it might be to some, nature will restore a balance if left alone. That balance might not be what we would like and some species would die out. 98% of species that have ever lived on earth are extinct.
I agree with reducing or removing invasive species where practical as that is another example of humans interfering with a ecosystem that is far too complex for us to understand.
I’m on this forum because I want to ethically reduce the number of deer to a population that is sustainable with the wider ecosystem. If i can feed my family and friends with the byproducts then that is a bonus. Im sorry to say it but if humans hadn’t killed off every apex predator and learned to live along side them, then the deer numbers would have been kept in better check.
I see the fear mongers come out every time wolves are mentioned, I have spend months in the wilderness in multiple countries with large wolf populations and have never been concerned or even heard of people having a dangerous encounter. I have seen several wolves in the wild and each time, they give a long stare and then run off.
I would question what the real motive for people who feel the need to shoot anything that preys on something else.
I know this will fall 99% fall on deaf ears, but hearing an alternate perspective is not a bad thing and forums like this can easily become echo chambers of a single view.
Just my thoughts![]()
Raptor populations are at very high levels these days, especially those few that would take magpie as a quarry.Maybe there are more magpies because humans killed a lot of the other birds of prey?!
I've worked on this farm for 8 years. My official title is probably shepherd, but in truth I do lot more than just look after the sheep; all the day to day running, 90% of time alone.Again just my thoughts I’m genuinely interested in hearing others
Which predators? Wolves, lynx, are they to be fenced allowed to roam free, this all seems a little half baked to meTotally agree which is why I would personally be in favour of reintroducing predators (I know there are downsides, but there are with everything)
I personally don’t buy into the belief that killing more predators (Corvids, raptors, foxes) will help redress the balance.
I understand that this situation has been created by man, but I really feel that nature knows best and if we were to use our might to try to bring our natural environment back to a level that is more in balance with natures needs and human needs then that is no bad thing.
More regenerative farming than rewilding every farm and learning to live alongside the good and bad of the natural world rather that remove the ‘bad’ and protect the ‘good’
Again just my thoughts I’m genuinely interested in hearing others