Have you seen the green parties views on hunting generally? As i believe most antis think, they are planning to ban all 'blood sports' not just those for the 'toffs'.
First they came for the Driven pheasant shooters..
And I did not speak out...
Because I was not a pheasant shooter...
I get there will always be those who push for a complete ban but as said before they are in a minority, most are undecided.
It is easier to make a case, in my opinion, if we argue on small scale shoots, pest and vermin control and deer management.
The ratio of conservation and habitat improvement by small shoots out weighs the environmental impact of putting birds down. Even better if they are natural birds like the late Duke of Edinburgh showed with the grey partridge. Walked up one for the pot as well is easy to justify.
Protecting ground nesting birds is a winner. As is supporting farming with crop protection. All of these can have a case made for their continued existence.
However, again in my opinion, putting thousands (millions?) of birds down and charging massive sums of money to shoot them then bulldozing them into a pit does make every other part of shooting suffer. Remove this and the wind goes from the Antis sails, doesn’t go away but the undecided then are not interested.
I had a discussion this week with some villagers who found out I shot deer. They asked,”how could you?”. When I pointed out the farmer had asked me as they had lost about 15% of his produce to deer damage and that I had taken 9 off his farm and there were still 8 there and we were watching the situation to see if any more needed coming off . They accepted the need. They realised it was not done just for “fun”.
I still hold our main problem is large scale driven shoots. But I’ve said that enough now.