The most significant research on shooting for a decade

You are absolutely right but to win that argument then you have admit that driven shooting is damaging the environment locally and any conservation work is a bit like BP buying green offsets.
Predator control is done to protect the birds primarily and adjacent wildlife is secondary but used as an excuse. Buzzards and other Raptors are shot by gamekeepers.
Look at the figures of participants in driven shooting in the article they make up a minority. Now look at the BASC magazine the majority of articles are aimed at driven shooting.
Large corporate days where hundreds of birds are killed and wounded and very little eaten does not put us in a good light.
As Barack Obama said ,”you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig”

Come and have a look at our shoot mate - Im not going to write and write about all the stuff we do but seriously you are welcome
 
Like you the hunting instinct is there.
I’m not however sure that those who turn up and shoot 300-500 birds have the same instinct. Putting the shot game into the food chain does not make right the fact that those doing it are only interested in the kill. It’s like BP and green offsets again.

The class war thing is real and you have hit the nail on the head. Certainly Tingay and Avery have an issue with rich people shooting and this motivated them to be so vociferous
This is why I said that if you took the driven days out, the argument for shooting is suddenly easier. We are all tarred with the brush of bulldozing pheasants into landfill and toffs in tweed.
Have you seen the green parties views on hunting generally? As i believe most antis think, they are planning to ban all 'blood sports' not just those for the 'toffs'.
 
Have you seen the green parties views on hunting generally? As i believe most antis think, they are planning to ban all 'blood sports' not just those for the 'toffs'.
First they came for the Driven pheasant shooters..
And I did not speak out...
Because I was not a pheasant shooter...
I get there will always be those who push for a complete ban but as said before they are in a minority, most are undecided.
It is easier to make a case, in my opinion, if we argue on small scale shoots, pest and vermin control and deer management.
The ratio of conservation and habitat improvement by small shoots out weighs the environmental impact of putting birds down. Even better if they are natural birds like the late Duke of Edinburgh showed with the grey partridge. Walked up one for the pot as well is easy to justify.
Protecting ground nesting birds is a winner. As is supporting farming with crop protection. All of these can have a case made for their continued existence.
However, again in my opinion, putting thousands (millions?) of birds down and charging massive sums of money to shoot them then bulldozing them into a pit does make every other part of shooting suffer. Remove this and the wind goes from the Antis sails, doesn’t go away but the undecided then are not interested.
I had a discussion this week with some villagers who found out I shot deer. They asked,”how could you?”. When I pointed out the farmer had asked me as they had lost about 15% of his produce to deer damage and that I had taken 9 off his farm and there were still 8 there and we were watching the situation to see if any more needed coming off . They accepted the need. They realised it was not done just for “fun”.
I still hold our main problem is large scale driven shoots. But I’ve said that enough now.
 
Come and have a look at our shoot mate - Im not going to write and write about all the stuff we do but seriously you are welcome
Love too. I don’t shoot shotguns any more after surgery to my neck as I cannot control the swing. My excuse I was never that good before the surgery🤣🤣
 
Yep, pheasant-dozing is not a good colour of tar. Hopefully this excellent report (with some surprising stats...) can prevent us from all being coloured with the same broad brush of ill-information. Thanks for sharing Mr O'Gorman!
 
I agree but we too need to accept that it’s not all good. Releasing millions of birds a year does affect the ecosystem in a negative way. There IS raptor killing in shooting areas. Something ALL pro shooting agencies deny but it is happening. The antis know this there is good evidence that the ecosystem around big shoots is not normal.
I’m not being negative but we cannot win this. Driven shooting in all its forms perhaps has had its day.
Why does everyone focus on the raptor persecution and forget the positives. There are far more birds of prey in this country as a result of driven game shooting, that should be blatantly obvious to anyone who has spent any time in the countryside
 
Can you prove that?
When Larsen traps were new to this country, a survey of two areas of land showed that small bird populations increased by 80% after the first year of hard corvid control. This resulted in an increase in other predators(I assumed this meant raptors). After 3 years of corvid controls and the increase in other predators, the average increase in the small bird population was 30%. I presume the predators/raptors had more to feed on.
 
Last edited:
When Larsen traps were new to this country, a survey of two areas of land showed that small bird populations increased by 80% after the first year of hard corvid control. This resulted in an increase in other predators(I assumed this meant raptors). After 3 years of corvid controls and the increase in other predators, the average increase in the small bird population was 30%. I presume the predators/raptors had more to feed on.
So Corvid control improved small bird numbers. Cannot disagree with that. The assumption that other predators are raptors cannot be made. Other predators could be Squirrel, stoat, weasel, fox, mink……
It’s a big jump to say that raptors improved because of Corvid reduction.
 
I can’t prove anything, but go out for yourself. Anywhere I have seen impressive numbers of raptors it has always been on driven shoots, unlike rspb reserves which are normally devoid of wildlife.
Not my experience I have to say. I’m no fan of the RSPB but I think the claim that raptors do better in driven shoots is very tenuous.
 
Not my experience I have to say. I’m no fan of the RSPB but I think the claim that raptors do better in driven shoots is very tenuous.

Again mate come look at our place - you wont believe the raptors - and we only have a small acreage really
Little owl
Goshawk
Kestrel
Kite
Buzzard
Merlin
Hobby
Spar
Peregrine
Barn Owl
Tawny Owl
Osprey - for about 3/5 days
That massive Lammerguir had a day with us a few years ago

When i started the "project" of planting / woodland management / ponding i wanted more than anything barn owls - we now have 6 pairs !
 
So Corvid control improved small bird numbers. Cannot disagree with that. The assumption that other predators are raptors cannot be made. Other predators could be Squirrel, stoat, weasel, fox, mink……
It’s a big jump to say that raptors improved because of Corvid reduction.
None so deaf as they who don't want to hear.
 
Back
Top